The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Domain Transfer Learning for MCI Conversion Prediction
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning methods have successfully been used to predict the conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD), by classifying MCI converters (MCI-C) from MCI nonconverters (MCI-NC). However, most existing methods construct classifiers using data from one particular target domain (e.g., MCI), and ignore data in other related domains (e.g., AD and normal control (NC)) that may provide valuable information to improve MCI conversion prediction performance. To address is limitation, we develop a novel domain transfer learning method for MCI conversion prediction, which can use data from both the target domain (i.e., MCI) and auxiliary domains (i.e., AD and NC). Specifically, the proposed method consists of three key components: 1) a domain transfer feature selection component that selects the most informative feature-subset from both target domain and auxiliary domains from different imaging modalities; 2) a domain transfer sample selection component that selects the most informative sample-subset from the same target and auxiliary domains from different data modalities; and 3) a domain transfer support vector machine classification component that fuses the selected features and samples to separate MCI-C and MCI-NC patients. We evaluate our method on 202 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) that have MRI, FDG-PET, and CSF data. The experimental results show the proposed method can classify MCI-C patients from MCI-NC patients with an accuracy of 79.4%, with the aid of additional domain knowledge learned from AD and NC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · Cited by 13,697
A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data
Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.668698 · Cited by 4,731
Baseline MRI predictors of conversion from MCI to probable AD in the ADNI cohort
Risacher, S., Saykin, A., Wes, J., Shen, L., Firpi, H., & McDonald, B. (2009) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720509788929273 · Cited by 538
Chételat, G., Landeau, B., Eustache, F., Mézenge, F., Viader, F., de la Sayette, V., Desgranges, B., & Baron, J.-C. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.015 · Cited by 526
Young, J., Modat, M., Cardoso, M. J., Mendelson, A., Cash, D., & Ourselin, S. (2013) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.004 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Domain adaptation for medical image analysis: A survey
Guan, H., & Liu, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2021.3117407 · Cited by 1,057
Self-citationSingle subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls
Arbabshirani, M. R., Plis, S., Sui, J., & Calhoun, V. D. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079 · Cited by 912
Rathore, S., Habes, M., Iftikhar, M. A., Shacklett, A., & Davatzikos, C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.057 · Cited by 622
Predicting alzheimer’s disease progression using multi-modal deep learning approach
Lee, G., Nho, K., Kang, B., Sohn, K.-A., Kim, D., Initiative, F. A. D. N., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P., Petersen, R., Jack, C. R., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37769-z · Cited by 406
El-Sappagh, S., Alonso, J. M., Islam, S. M. R., Sultan, A. M., & Kwak, K. S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82098-3 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, B., Liu, M., Zhang, D., Munsell, B. C., & Shen, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1805-1817
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2018935975
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.