Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel Algorithm for the Automatic Detection of Sleep Apnea From Single-Lead ECG

Open access
Varon, Carolina, Caicedo, Alexander, Testelmans, Dries, Buyse, Bertien, Van Huffel, Sabine·2015·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

GOAL: This paper presents a methodology for the automatic detection of sleep apnea from single-lead ECG. METHODS: It uses two novel features derived from the ECG, and two well-known features in heart rate variability analysis, namely the standard deviation and the serial correlation coefficients of the RR interval time series. The first novel feature uses the principal components of the QRS complexes, and it describes changes in their morphology caused by an increased sympathetic activity during apnea. The second novel feature extracts the information shared between respiration and heart rate using orthogonal subspace projections. Respiratory information is derived from the ECG by means of three state-of-the-art algorithms, which are implemented and compared here. All features are used as input to a least-squares support vector machines classifier, using an RBF kernel. In total, 80 ECG recordings were included in the study. RESULTS: Accuracies of about 85% are achieved on a minute-by-minute basis, for two independent datasets including both hypopneas and apneas together. Separation between apnea and normal recordings is achieved with 100% accuracy. In addition to apnea classification, the proposed methodology determines the contamination level of each ECG minute. CONCLUSION: The performances achieved are comparable with those reported in the literature for fully automated algorithms. SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that the use of only ECG sensors can achieve good accuracies in the detection of sleep apnea. Moreover, the contamination level of each ECG segment can be used to automatically detect artefacts, and to highlight segments that require further visual inspection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2015.2422378

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Varon, C., Caicedo, A., Testelmans, D., Buyse, B., & Van Huffel, S.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2015-09
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
2269-2278
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2045259847
Cited by
347
References
4
FWCI
16.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Algorithm for the Automatic Detection of Sleep Apnea From Single-Lead ECG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2015.2422378
The paper
Varon, C., Caicedo, A., Testelmans, D., Buyse, B., & Van Huffel, S. (2015). A Novel Algorithm for the Automatic Detection of Sleep Apnea From Single-Lead ECG. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2015.2422378

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.