The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Discriminatively Trained Fully Connected Conditional Random Field Model for Blood Vessel Segmentation in Fundus Images
Open accessAbstract
GOAL: In this work, we present an extensive description and evaluation of our method for blood vessel segmentation in fundus images based on a discriminatively trained fully connected conditional random field model. METHODS: Standard segmentation priors such as a Potts model or total variation usually fail when dealing with thin and elongated structures. We overcome this difficulty by using a conditional random field model with more expressive potentials, taking advantage of recent results enabling inference of fully connected models almost in real time. Parameters of the method are learned automatically using a structured output support vector machine, a supervised technique widely used for structured prediction in a number of machine learning applications. RESULTS: Our method, trained with state of the art features, is evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively on four publicly available datasets: DRIVE, STARE, CHASEDB1, and HRF. Additionally, a quantitative comparison with respect to other strategies is included. CONCLUSION: The experimental results show that this approach outperforms other techniques when evaluated in terms of sensitivity, F1-score, G-mean, and Matthews correlation coefficient. Additionally, it was observed that the fully connected model is able to better distinguish the desired structures than the local neighborhood-based approach. SIGNIFICANCE: Results suggest that this method is suitable for the task of segmenting elongated structures, a feature that can be exploited to contribute with other medical and biological applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina
Staal, J., Abramoff, M. D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M. A., & van Ginneken, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.825627 · Cited by 4,202
Epidemiology of Major Eye Diseases Leading to Blindness in Europe: A Literature Review
Prokofyeva, E., & Zrenner, E. (2012) · Ophthalmic Research · doi:10.1159/000329603 · Cited by 212
Self-citation
Cited by
Orlando, J. I., Fu, H., Barbosa Breda, J., van Keer, K., Bathula, D. R., Diaz-Pinto, A., Fang, R., Heng, P.-A., Kim, J., Lee, J., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101570 · Cited by 855
Self-citationA Three-Stage Deep Learning Model for Accurate Retinal Vessel Segmentation
Yan, Z., Yang, X., & Cheng, K.-T. (2019) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2872813 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlando, J. I., Prokofyeva, E., & Blaschko, M. B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-27
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2320230300
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.