Cited by 4,202Retinal Imaging and AnalysisMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina

Staal, J., Abramoff, M.D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M.A., van Ginneken, B.·2004·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

A method is presented for automated segmentation of vessels in two-dimensional color images of the retina. This method can be used in computer analyses of retinal images, e.g., in automated screening for diabetic retinopathy. The system is based on extraction of image ridges, which coincide approximately with vessel centerlines. The ridges are used to compose primitives in the form of line elements. With the line elements an image is partitioned into patches by assigning each image pixel to the closest line element. Every line element constitutes a local coordinate frame for its corresponding patch. For every pixel, feature vectors are computed that make use of properties of the patches and the line elements. The feature vectors are classified using a kappaNN-classifier and sequential forward feature selection. The algorithm was tested on a database consisting of 40 manually labeled images. The method achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.952. The method is compared with two recently published rule-based methods of Hoover et al. and Jiang et al. The results show that our method is significantly better than the two rule-based methods (p < 0.01). The accuracy of our method is 0.944 versus 0.947 for a second observer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2004.825627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DRIVE dataset consists of 20 images and is a standardized benchmark for evaluating retinal blood vessel segmentation methods in diabetic retinopathy screening.

    “The DRIVE [45] dataset consists of 20 images, developed to provide a standardized benchmark for evaluating retinal blood vessel segmentation methods in the context of diabetic retinopathy screening.”

    From rNCA: Self-Repairing Segmentation Masks (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staal, J., Abramoff, M. D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M. A., & van Ginneken, B.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2004-04
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
501-509
ISSN
0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150769593
Cited by
4,202
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 241 · 2025: 355 · 2024: 323 · 2023: 350 · 2022: 349 · 2021: 319 · 2020: 295 · 2019: 315 · 2018: 217 · 2017: 220 · 2016: 175 · 2015: 172 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 134 · 2012: 130
FWCI
24.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
retinal vessel segmentation, color retinal images, ridge extraction, vessel centerline, line element, local coordinate frames, feature vectors, k-nearest neighbors, sequential forward feature selection, diabetic retinopathy screening, automated retinal analysis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Color, Diabetic Retinopathy, Expert Systems, Fluorescein Angiography, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Ophthalmoscopy, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Retina, Retinal Vessels, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review