The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dermoscopic Image Segmentation via Multistage Fully Convolutional Networks
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Segmentation of skin lesions is an important step in the automated computer aided diagnosis of melanoma. However, existing segmentation methods have a tendency to over- or under-segment the lesions and perform poorly when the lesions have fuzzy boundaries, low contrast with the background, inhomogeneous textures, or contain artifacts. Furthermore, the performance of these methods are heavily reliant on the appropriate tuning of a large number of parameters as well as the use of effective preprocessing techniques, such as illumination correction and hair removal. METHODS: We propose to leverage fully convolutional networks (FCNs) to automatically segment the skin lesions. FCNs are a neural network architecture that achieves object detection by hierarchically combining low-level appearance information with high-level semantic information. We address the issue of FCN producing coarse segmentation boundaries for challenging skin lesions (e.g., those with fuzzy boundaries and/or low difference in the textures between the foreground and the background) through a multistage segmentation approach in which multiple FCNs learn complementary visual characteristics of different skin lesions; early stage FCNs learn coarse appearance and localization information while late-stage FCNs learn the subtle characteristics of the lesion boundaries. We also introduce a new parallel integration method to combine the complementary information derived from individual segmentation stages to achieve a final segmentation result that has accurate localization and well-defined lesion boundaries, even for the most challenging skin lesions. RESULTS: We achieved an average Dice coefficient of 91.18% on the ISBI 2016 Skin Lesion Challenge dataset and 90.66% on the PH2 dataset. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our extensive experimental results on two well-established public benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method is more effective than other state-of-the-art methods for skin lesion segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., Yao, J., Mollura, D., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 · Cited by 5,759
Codella, N. C. F., Gutman, D., Celebi, M. E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M. A., Dusza, S. W., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., Mishra, N., Kittler, H., et al. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2018.8363547 · Cited by 2,620
Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy
Kittler, H., Pehamberger, H., Wolff, K., & Binder, M. (2002) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00679-4 · Cited by 1,349
PH2 - A dermoscopic image database for research and benchmarking
Mendonca, T., Ferreira, P. M., Marques, J. S., Marcal, A. R. S., & Rozeira, J. (2013) · 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2013.6610779 · Cited by 1,009
Cited by
Gu, R., Wang, G., Song, T., Huang, R., Aertsen, M., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., Vercauteren, T., & Zhang, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.3035253 · Cited by 720
Structure Boundary Preserving Segmentation for Medical Image With Ambiguous Boundary
Lee, H. J., Kim, J. U., Lee, S., Kim, H. G., & Ro, Y. M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00487 · Cited by 180
Self-citationSkin disease diagnosis with deep learning: a review
Li, H., Pan, Y., Zhao, J., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.08.096 · Cited by 178
Artificial intelligence applications in dermatology: Where do we stand?
Gomolin, A., Netchiporouk, E., Gniadecki, R., & Litvinov, I. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00100 · Cited by 142
Zhao, Z., Wu, C.-M., Zhang, S., He, F., Liu, F., Wang, B., Huang, Y., Shi, W., Jian, D., Xie, H., et al. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/23415 · Cited by 58
“Generally, the data sources for the interpretation of machine learning varies from digital medical records [35,36], histopathological pictures [37], and clinical photos [38-41] to dermoscopic images [42-50].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bi, L., Kim, J., Ahn, E., Kumar, A., Fulham, M., & Feng, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2065-2074
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2623166637
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dermoscopic Image Segmentation via Multistage Fully Convolutional Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2017.2712771
- The paper
- Bi, L., Kim, J., Ahn, E., Kumar, A., Fulham, M., & Feng, D. (2017). Dermoscopic Image Segmentation via Multistage Fully Convolutional Networks. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2017.2712771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.