The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks with Fault-Tolerance for Structural Health Monitoring
Abstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are implemented for structures (e.g., bridges, buildings) to monitor their operations and health status. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are becoming an enabling technology for SHM applications that are more prevalent and more easily deployable than traditional wired networks. However, SHM brings new challenges to WSNs: engineering-driven optimal deployment, a large volume of data, sophisticated computing, and so forth. In this paper, we address two important challenges: sensor deployment and decentralized computing. We propose a solution, to deploy wireless sensors at strategic locations to achieve the best estimates of structural health (e.g., damage) by following the widely used wired sensor system deployment approach from civil/structural engineering. We found that faults (caused by communication errors, unstable connectivity, sensor faults, etc.) in such a deployed WSN greatly affect the performance of SHM. To make the WSN resilient to the faults, we present an approach, called${\tt FTSHM}$(fault-tolerance in SHM), to repair the WSN and guarantee a specified degree of fault tolerance.${\tt FTSHM}$searches the repairing points in clusters in a distributed manner, and places a set of backup sensors at those points in such a way that still satisfies the engineering requirements.${\tt FTSHM}$also includes an SHM algorithm suitable for decentralized computing in the energy-constrained WSN, with the objective of guaranteeing that the WSN for SHM remains connected in the event of a fault, thus prolonging the WSN lifetime under connectivity and data delivery constraints. We demonstrate the advantages of${\tt FTSHM}$through extensive simulations and real experimental settings on a physical structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PrivacyProtector: Privacy-Protected Patient Data Collection in IoT-Based Healthcare Systems
Luo, E., Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Wang, G., Rahman, M. A., Wu, J., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1700364 · Cited by 266
Self-citationComputational methodologies for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring: A review
Tan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921719877579 · Cited by 186
Hassani, S., & Dackermann, U. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23063293 · Cited by 146
AI in structural health monitoring for infrastructure maintenance and safety
Plevris, V., & Papazafeiropoulos, G. (2024) · Infrastructures · doi:10.3390/infrastructures9120225 · Cited by 132
Mustapha, S., Lu, Y., Ng, C.-T., & Malinowski, P. (2021) · Vibration · doi:10.3390/vibration4030033 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Wang, G., Cao, J., & Wu, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computers
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 382-395
- ISSN
- 0018-9340 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9956
- 2326-3814
- OpenAlex
- W1963593820
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks with Fault-Tolerance for Structural Health Monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tc.2013.195
- The paper
- Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Wang, G., Cao, J., & Wu, J. (2015). Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks with Fault-Tolerance for Structural Health Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Computers. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2013.195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.