AI in structural health monitoring for infrastructure maintenance and safety
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the growing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on structural health monitoring (SHM), a critical aspect of infrastructure maintenance and safety. This study begins with a bibliometric analysis to identify current research trends, key contributing countries, and emerging topics in AI-integrated SHM. We examine seven core areas where AI significantly advances SHM capabilities: (1) data acquisition and sensor networks, highlighting improvements in sensor technology and data collection; (2) data processing and signal analysis, where AI techniques enhance feature extraction and noise reduction; (3) anomaly detection and damage identification using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) for precise diagnostics; (4) predictive maintenance, using AI to optimize maintenance scheduling and prevent failures; (5) reliability and risk assessment, integrating diverse datasets for real-time risk analysis; (6) visual inspection and remote monitoring, showcasing the role of AI-powered drones and imaging systems; and (7) resilient and adaptive infrastructure, where AI enables systems to respond dynamically to changing conditions. This review also addresses the ethical considerations and societal impacts of AI in SHM, such as data privacy, equity, and transparency. We conclude by discussing future research directions and challenges, emphasizing the potential of AI to enhance the efficiency, safety, and sustainability of infrastructure systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI algorithms use historical and real-time data to forecast the remaining service life of components.
“algorithms use historical and real-time data to forecast the remaining service life of components.”
From Artificial intelligence in civil engineering: emerging applications and opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as Plevris and Papazafeiropoulos, 2024
AI-based monitoring helps infrastructure operators prioritize interventions and allocate budgets more effectively.
“By providing timely diagnostics and forecasts, AI-based monitoring helps infrastructure operators prioritize interventions and allocate budgets more effectively (Plevris and Papazafeiropoulos, 2024; Plevris et al., 2023).”
From Artificial intelligence in civil engineering: emerging applications and opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as Plevris and Papazafeiropoulos, 2024
Cites
Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554 · see citing works
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102778 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Accountability in artificial intelligence: what it is and how it works
Novelli, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01635-y · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review
Lyell, D., & Coiera, E. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw105 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements
Balasubramaniam, N., Kauppinen, M., Rannisto, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Kujala, S. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107197 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Automation Bias: Decision Making and Performance in High-Tech Cockpits
Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. (1998) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0801_3 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Jia, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23218824 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Ethical Aspects of the Impact of AI: the Status of Humans in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Rakowski, R., Polak, P., & Kowalikova, P. (2021) · Society · doi:10.1007/s12115-021-00586-8 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in civil engineering: emerging applications and opportunities
Nyokum, T., & Tamut, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Built Environment · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2025.1622873 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Plevris, V., & Papazafeiropoulos, G.
- Affiliations
- Qatar University (QA)
- National Technical University of Athens (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Plevris, Vagelis
- Venue
- Infrastructures
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-12-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 225
- ISSN
- 2412-3811 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405191526
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 60
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Infrastructures (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
- Keywords
- structural health monitoring, artificial intelligence, infrastructure maintenance, infrastructure safety, damage detection, anomaly detection, predictive maintenance, risk assessment, sensor networks, signal processing, machine learning, deep learning, unmanned aerial vehicles, visual inspection, remote monitoring, infrastructure resilience, AI ethics, data privacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review