The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Sword with Two Edges: Propagation Studies on Both Positive and Negative Information in Online Social Networks
Open accessAbstract
Online social networks (OSN) have become one of the major platforms for people to exchange information. Both positive information (e.g., ideas, news and opinions) and negative information (e.g., rumors and gossips) spreading in social media can greatly influence our lives. Previously, researchers have proposed models to understand their propagation dynamics. However, those were merely simulations in nature and only focused on the spread of one type of information. Due to the human-related factors involved, simultaneous spread of negative and positive information cannot be thought of the superposition of two independent propagations. In order to fix these deficiencies, we propose an analytical model which is built stochastically from a node level up. It can present the temporal dynamics of spread such as the time people check newly arrived messages or forward them. Moreover, it is capable of capturing people’s behavioral differences in preferring what to believe or disbelieve. We studied the social parameters impact on propagation using this model. We found that some factors such as people’s preference and the injection time of the opposing information are critical to the propagation but some others such as the hearsay forwarding intention have little impact on it. The extensive simulations conducted on the real topologies confirm the high accuracy of our model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
On the evolution of user interaction in facebook
Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Online social networks · doi:10.1145/1592665.1592675 · Cited by 1,461
Cited by
Influence Maximization on Social Graphs: A Survey
Li, Y., Fan, J., Wang, Y., & Tan, K.-L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2807843 · Cited by 659
A Survey of IoT Applications in Blockchain Systems: Architecture, Consensus, and Traffic Modeling
Lao, L., Li, Z., Hou, S., Xiao, B., Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3372136 · Cited by 304
Insider Threat Identification Using the Simultaneous Neural Learning of Multi-Source Logs
Liu, L., Chen, C., Zhang, J., De Vel, O., & Xiang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2957055 · Cited by 31
Self-citationDoc2vec-Based Insider Threat Detection through Behaviour Analysis of Multi-source Security Logs
Liu, L., Chen, C., Zhang, J., De Vel, O., & Xiang, Y. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom50675.2020.00050 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, S., Haghighi, M. S., Chen, C., Xiang, Y., Zhou, W., & Jia, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computers
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 640-653
- ISSN
- 0018-9340 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9956
- 2326-3814
- OpenAlex
- W2137052698
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Sword with Two Edges: Propagation Studies on Both Positive and Negative Information in Online Social Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tc.2013.2295802
- The paper
- Wen, S., Haghighi, M. S., Chen, C., Xiang, Y., Zhou, W., & Jia, W. (2015). A Sword with Two Edges: Propagation Studies on Both Positive and Negative Information in Online Social Networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2013.2295802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.