Cited by 10Network Security and Intrusion DetectionInformation and Cyber SecurityUser Authentication and Security Systems

Doc2vec-Based Insider Threat Detection through Behaviour Analysis of Multi-source Security Logs

Liu, Liu, Chen, Chao, Zhang, Jun, De Vel, Olivier, Xiang, Yang·2020·2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)

Abstract

Since insider attacks have been recognised as one of the most critical cyber security threats to an organisation, detection of malicious insiders has received increasing attention in recent years. Previously, we proposed an approach that performs the detection by analysing various security logs with Word2vec, which not only removes the reliance on prior knowledge but also greatly simplifies the process of decision making and improves the interpretability of the alerts. In this paper, following the similar idea, a new Doc2vec based approach is proposed to overcome the previous approach's limitations: (1) the behaviour metrics can be acquired straightforwardly due to the Doc2vec's capability in inferring unseen texts of any length; (2) other than the temporal metrics, some spatial metrics can also be realised, providing a more comprehensive insight into the unusual behaviours; and (3) a range of corpora are produced by adopting different keywords to aggregate, each of which may be suited to a specific type of behaviour metrics. A large number of numerical experiments are conducted using the same benchmark insider threat database, for the purpose of testing how the corpora, metrics and training parameters impact on the performance and be related to each other. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach can achieve a similar performance with greater simplicity and flexibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/trustcom50675.2020.00050

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tokenization is applied to CERT Insider Threat dataset logs to identify anomalous communication patterns in email content or log entries.

    “For example, tokenization is applied to CERT Insider Threat dataset logs to identify anomalous communication patterns in email content or log entries [13,66].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Chen, C., Zhang, J., De Vel, O., & Xiang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • Defence Science and Technology Group, Australia
Venue
2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12
Pages
301-309
OpenAlex
W3124281509
Cited by
9
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Defence Science and Technology (DST) Group
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
insider threat detection, malicious insiders, Doc2Vec, security logs, behavior analysis, Word2Vec, spatial metrics, temporal metrics, cybersecurity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review