The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Majority-Inverter Graph: A New Paradigm for Logic Optimization
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a paradigm shift in representing and optimizing logic by using only majority (MAJ) and inversion (INV) functions as basic operations. We represent logic functions by majority-inverter graph (MIG): a directed acyclic graph consisting of three-input majority nodes and regular/complemented edges. We optimize MIGs via a new Boolean algebra, based exclusively on majority and inversion operations, that we formally axiomatize in this paper. As a complement to MIG algebraic optimization, we develop powerful Boolean methods exploiting global properties of MIGs, such as bit-error masking. MIG algebraic and Boolean methods together attain very high optimization quality. Considering the set of IWLS'05 benchmarks, our MIG optimizer (MIGhty) enables a 7% depth reduction in LUT-6 circuits mapped by ABC while also reducing size and power activity, with respect to similar and-inverter graph (AIG) optimization. Focusing on arithmetic intensive benchmarks instead, MIGhty enables a 16% depth reduction in LUT-6 circuits mapped by ABC, again with respect to similar AIG optimization. Employed as front-end to a delay-critical 22-nm application-specified integrated circuit flow (logic synthesis + physical design) MIGhty reduces the average delay/area/power by 13%/4%/3%, respectively, over 31 academic and industrial benchmarks. We also demonstrate delay/area/power improvements by 10%/10%/5% for a commercial FPGA flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The EPFL Combinational Benchmark Suite
Amarù, L., Gaillardon, P., Testa, E., & Giovanni De Micheli, A. (2019) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2572933 · Cited by 285
Self-citationControlled Majority-Inverter Graph Logic With Highly Nonlinear, Self-Rectifying Memristor
Ni, R., Yang, L., Huang, X.-D., Ren, S.-G., Wan, T.-Q., Li, Y., & Miao, X.-S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · doi:10.1109/ted.2021.3106234 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Amaru, L., Gaillardon, P.-E., & De Micheli, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 806-819
- ISSN
- 0278-0070 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4151
- OpenAlex
- W1776822698
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Majority-Inverter Graph: A New Paradigm for Logic Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcad.2015.2488484
- The paper
- Amaru, L., Gaillardon, P.-E., & De Micheli, G. (2016). Majority-Inverter Graph: A New Paradigm for Logic Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcad.2015.2488484
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.