The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying Bacterial Virulent Proteins by Fusing a Set of Classifiers Based on Variants of Chou's Pseudo Amino Acid Composition and on Evolutionary Information
Abstract
The availability of a reliable prediction method for prediction of bacterial virulent proteins has several important applications in research efforts targeted aimed at finding novel drug targets, vaccine candidates, and understanding virulence mechanisms in pathogens. In this work, we have studied several feature extraction approaches for representing proteins and propose a novel bacterial virulent protein prediction method, based on an ensemble of classifiers where the features are extracted directly from the amino acid sequence and from the evolutionary information of a given protein. We have evaluated and compared several ensembles obtained by combining six feature extraction methods and several classification approaches based on two general purpose classifiers (i.e., Support Vector Machine and a variant of input decimated ensemble) and their random subspace version. An extensive evaluation was performed according to a blind testing protocol, where the parameters of the system are optimized using the training set and the system is validated in three different independent data sets, allowing selection of the most performing system and demonstrating the validity of the proposed method. Based on the results obtained using the blind test protocol, it is interesting to note that even if in each independent data set the most performing stand-alone method is not always the same, the fusion of different methods enhances prediction efficiency in all the tested independent data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Chou, K.-C., & Cai, Y.-D. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m204161200 · Cited by 483
Support vector machines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition
Cai, Y.-D., Zhou, G.-P., & Chou, K.-C. (2003) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(03)70050-2 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Guo, S.-H., Deng, E.-Z., Xu, L.-Q., Ding, H., Lin, H., Chen, W., & Chou, K.-C. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu083 · Cited by 375
Du, P., Wang, X., Xu, C., & Gao, Y. (2012) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2012.03.015 · Cited by 308
Liu, B., Xu, J., Lan, X., Xu, R., Zhou, J., Wang, X., & Chou, K.-C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106691 · Cited by 306
Jia, J., Liu, Z., Xiao, X., Liu, B., & Chou, K.-C. (2015) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.04.011 · Cited by 276
Identification of Real MicroRNA Precursors with a Pseudo Structure Status Composition Approach
Liu, B., Fang, L., Liu, F., Wang, X., Chen, J., & Chou, K.-C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121501 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Nanni, L., Lumini, A., Gupta, D., & Garg, A.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 467-475
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016319093
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Bacterial Virulent Proteins by Fusing a Set of Classifiers Based on Variants of Chou's Pseudo Amino Acid Composition and on Evolutionary Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcbb.2011.117
- The paper
- Nanni, L., Lumini, A., Gupta, D., & Garg, A. (2012). Identifying Bacterial Virulent Proteins by Fusing a Set of Classifiers Based on Variants of Chou's Pseudo Amino Acid Composition and on Evolutionary Information. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcbb.2011.117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.