Cited by 208Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Prediction and Validation of Disease Genes Using HeteSim Scores

Zeng, Xiangxiang, Liao, Yuanlu, Liu, Yuansheng, Zou, Quan·2017·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Deciphering the gene disease association is an important goal in biomedical research. In this paper, we use a novel relevance measure, called HeteSim, to prioritize candidate disease genes. Two methods based on heterogeneous networks constructed using protein-protein interaction, gene-phenotype associations, and phenotype-phenotype similarity, are presented. In HeteSim_MultiPath (HSMP), HeteSim scores of different paths are combined with a constant that dampens the contributions of longer paths. In HeteSim_SVM (HSSVM), HeteSim scores are combined with a machine learning method. The 3-fold experiments show that our non-machine learning method HSMP performs better than the existing non-machine learning methods, our machine learning method HSSVM obtains similar accuracy with the best existing machine learning method CATAPULT. From the analysis of the top 10 predicted genes for different diseases, we found that HSSVM avoid the disadvantage of the existing machine learning based methods, which always predict similar genes for different diseases. The data sets and Matlab code for the two methods are freely available for download at http://lab.malab.cn/data/HeteSim/index.jsp.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbb.2016.2520947

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several researches proved that coding genes, noncoding RNAs, and proteins are related to diseases, including AD.

    “Several researches proved that coding genes/noncoding RNAs/proteins were related to diseases, including AD [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, X., Liao, Y., Liu, Y., & Zou, Q.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
687-695
ISSN
1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2274610632
Cited by
208
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20
FWCI
20.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61272152, 61370010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
disease gene prediction, heterogeneous networks, gene-disease association, protein-protein interaction network, genotype-phenotype correlation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Genes, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review