The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Minimum mean brightness error bi-histogram equalization in contrast enhancement
Abstract
Histogram equalization (HE) is widely used for contrast enhancement. However, it tends to change the brightness of an image and hence, not suitable for consumer electronic products, where preserving the original brightness is essential to avoid annoying artifacts. Bi-histogram equalization (BBHE) has been proposed and analyzed mathematically that it can preserve the original brightness to a certain extends. However, there are still cases that are not handled well by BBHE, as they require higher degree of preservation. This paper proposes a novel extension of BBHE referred to as minimum mean brightness error bi-histogram equalization (MMBEBHE) to provide maximum brightness preservation. BBHE separates the input image's histogram into two based on input mean before equalizing them independently. This paper proposes to perform the separation based on the threshold level, which would yield minimum absolute mean brightness error (AMBE - the absolute difference between input and output mean). An efficient recursive integer-based computation for AMBE has been formulated to facilitate real time implementation. Simulation results using sample image which represent images with very low, very high and medium mean brightness show that the cases which are not handled well by HE, BBHE and dualistic sub image histogram equalization (DSIHE), can be properly enhanced by MMBEBHE. Besides, MMBEBHE also demonstrate comparable performance with BBHE and DSIHE when come to use the sample images show in [Yeong-Taeg Kim, February 1997] and [Yu Wan et al., October 5 1999].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transform coefficient histogram-based image enhancement algorithms using contrast entropy
Agaian, S. S., Silver, B., & Panetta, K. A. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.888338 · Cited by 575
Contextual and Variational Contrast Enhancement
Celik, T., & Tjahjadi, T. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2157513 · Cited by 531
Image enhancement using Exposure based Sub Image Histogram Equalization
Singh, K., & Kapoor, R. (2014) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2013.08.024 · Cited by 393
Brightness preserving histogram equalization with maximum entropy: a variational perspective
Wang, C., & Ye, Z. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2005.1561863 · Cited by 386
Brightness preserving dynamic fuzzy histogram equalization
Sheet, D., Garud, H., Suveer, A., Mahadevappa, M., & Chatterjee, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2010.5681130 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S.-D., & Ramli, A. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1310-1319
- ISSN
- 0098-3063 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-4127
- OpenAlex
- W2118002060
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimum mean brightness error bi-histogram equalization in contrast enhancement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tce.2003.1261234
- The paper
- Chen, S.-D., & Ramli, A. R. (2003). Minimum mean brightness error bi-histogram equalization in contrast enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2003.1261234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.