Cited by 26Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and dialogue systemsSpeech and Audio Processing

A unit selection text-to-speech synthesis system optimized for use with screen readers

Chalamandaris, Aimilios, Karabetsos, Sotiris, Tsiakoulis, Pirros, Raptis, Spyros·2010·IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics

Abstract

Currently, unit-selection text-to-speech technology is the common approach for near-natural speech synthesis systems. Such systems provide an important aid for blind or partially-sighted people, when combined with screen reading software. However, although the overall quality of the synthetic speech achieved by such systems can be quite high, this fact alone does not guarantee a high level of user satisfaction. Many issues have to be coped with in order to fulfill users' expectations when integrating such systems with screen reading tools aiming to assist blind users. This work describes the design and the implementation approaches for the efficient integration of this technology into screen reading environments. In particular, the issues of natural language processing, speed optimization, multilingual design and overall quality optimization are mainly addressed in this paper. In order to evaluate the resulting system, we carried out subjective assessment tests where expert users provided feedback about performance, quality and overall experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tce.2010.5606343

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chalamandaris, A., Karabetsos, S., Tsiakoulis, P., & Raptis, S.
Affiliations
Institute for Language and Speech Processing (GR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
Published
2010-08
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
1890-1897
ISSN
0098-3063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130596350
Cited by
26
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
screen readers, blind users, assistive technology, multilingual speech synthesis, user satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review