The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Harnessing Smoothness to Accelerate Distributed Optimization
Open accessAbstract
There has been a growing effort in studying the distributed optimization problem over a network. The objective is to optimize a global function formed by a sum of local functions, using only local computation and communication. The literature has developed consensus-based distributed (sub)gradient descent (DGD) methods and has shown that they have the same convergence rate$O(\frac{\log t}{\sqrt{t}})$as the centralized (sub)gradient methods (CGD), when the function is convex but possibly nonsmooth. However, when the function is convex and smooth, under the framework of DGD, it is unclear how to harness the smoothness to obtain a faster convergence rate comparable to CGD's convergence rate. In this paper, we propose a distributed algorithm that, despite using the same amount of communication per iteration as DGD, can effectively harnesses the function smoothness and converge to the optimum with a rate of$O(\frac{1}{t})$. If the objective function is further strongly convex, our algorithm has a linear convergence rate. Both rates match the convergence rate of CGD. The key step in our algorithm is a novel gradient estimation scheme that uses history information to achieve fast and accurate estimation of the average gradient. To motivate the necessity of history information, we also show that it is impossible for a class of distributed algorithms like DGD to achieve a linear convergence rate without using history information even if the objective function is strongly convex and smooth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 1×
“2The selection of the consensus weights is an intensely studied problem (see [35] and [36]).”
BackgroundHorn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139020411 · Cited by 4,642
Distributed Subgradient Methods for Multi-Agent Optimization
Nedic, A., & Ozdaglar, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.2009515 · Cited by 3,719
EXTRA: An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimization
Shi, W., Ling, Q., Wu, G., & Yin, W. (2015) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/14096668x · Cited by 1,261
Distributed Optimization Over Time-Varying Directed Graphs
Nedic, A., & Olshevsky, A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2364096 · Cited by 1,187
Distributed Stochastic Subgradient Projection Algorithms for Convex Optimization
Sundhar Ram, S., Nedić, A., & Veeravalli, V. V. (2010) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10957-010-9737-7 · Cited by 814
On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descent
Yuan, K., Ling, Q., & Yin, W. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.7063 · Cited by 635
NEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimization
Lorenzo, P. D., & Scutari, G. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks · doi:10.1109/tsipn.2016.2524588 · Cited by 473
Xu, J., Zhu, S., Soh, Y. C., & Xie, L. (2015) · 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2015.7402509 · Cited by 332
Cited by
A survey of distributed optimization
Yang, T., Yi, X., Wu, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, D., Meng, Z., Hong, Y., Wang, H., Lin, Z., & Johansson, K. H. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 · Cited by 913
Distributed stochastic gradient tracking methods
Pu, S., & Nedić, A. (2021) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-020-01487-0 · Cited by 266
Xin, R., Kar, S., & Khan, U. A. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2020.2974267 · Cited by 114
Optimization for Reinforcement Learning: From a single agent to cooperative agents
Lee, D., He, N., Kamalaruban, P., & Cevher, V. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2020.2976000 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Qu, G., & Li, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1245-1260
- ISSN
- 2325-5870 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2533
- OpenAlex
- W2763533254
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 22.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harnessing Smoothness to Accelerate Distributed Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcns.2017.2698261
- The paper
- Qu, G., & Li, N. (2018). Harnessing Smoothness to Accelerate Distributed Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcns.2017.2698261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.