Cited by 24PAPR reduction in OFDMAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesPower Line Communications and Noise

Intercarrier Interference Immune Single Carrier OFDM via Magnitude-Keyed Modulation for High Speed Aerial Vehicle Communication

Li, Xue, Hong, Steven, Chakravarthy, Vasu D., Temple, Michael, Wu, Zhiqiang·2013·IEEE Transactions on Communications

Abstract

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) has been considered as a strong candidate for next generation wireless communication systems. Compared to traditional OFDM, Single Carrier OFDM (SC-OFDM) has demonstrated excellent bit error rate (BER) performance, as well as low peak to average power ratio (PAPR). Similar to other multi-carrier transmission technologies, SC-OFDM suffers significant performance degradation resulting from intercarrier interference (ICI) in high mobility environments. Existing techniques for OFDM can be directly adopted in SC-OFDM to improve performance, however, this improved performance comes at costs such as decreased throughput. In this paper, we analyze the effect of ICI on an SC-OFDM system and propose a novel modulation scheme. The proposed Magnitude-Keyed Modulation (MKM) modulation provides SC-OFDM system immunity to ICI and with an easy implementation it significantly outperforms OFDM, SC-OFDM and MC-CDMA systems with Phase Shift Keying (PSK) modulation and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) in severe ICI environment. Analysis also illustrates the proposed SC-OFDM system with MKM modulation maintains low PAPR compared to traditional OFDM and SC-OFDM systems with PSK and QAM modulations. Simulation results for different modulation schemes in various ICI environments confirm the effectiveness of the proposed system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcomm.2012.122112.110214

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The communication services provided on board are challenged by high mobility, Doppler shift, frequent hand-over, lack of coverage, and so on.

    “The communication services provided on board are challenging by the high mobility, Doppler shift, frequent hand-over, lack of coverage, and so on [38].”

    From What should 6G be? (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, X., Hong, S., Chakravarthy, V. D., Temple, M., & Wu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Wright State University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
  • U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Published
2013-02
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
658-668
ISSN
0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063853336
Cited by
24
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › PAPR reduction in OFDM
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Line Communications and Noise
Keywords
inter-carrier interference, high-mobility wireless communication, peak-to-average power ratio, bit error rate, modulation scheme design, interference resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review