Cited by 14Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptographyError Correcting Code Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical Characterization of Decryption Errors in Block-Ciphered Systems

Jian Wang, Jiaqi Mu, Shuangqing Wei, Chunxiao Jiang, Beaulieu, Norman C.·2015·IEEE Transactions on Communications

Abstract

It is well known that avalanche effect errors in received noisy ciphertexts will cause severe error propagation in block-ciphered encryption systems, thus resulting in a large reduction in the achievable throughput. However, little is known about the statistical properties of the underlying error sequences in decrypted plaintexts in block-ciphered systems when channel errors are present. A rigorous study of the statistical properties of the errors in block-ciphered crypto-systems operating in cipher block chaining (CBC) mode is provided. The equivalent channel transition probability is obtained and then used to derive error statistics including both error weight probabilities and gap distributions. The validity of the theoretical analyses is confirmed by the excellent match with results obtained by simulated data encryption standard (DES)-based and advanced encryption standard (AES)-based crypto-systems operating in CBC mode. The error statistics will be valuable in the design and performance evaluation of communication protocols, as well as in error-control schemes for block-ciphered crypto-systems in the presence of erroneous ciphertexts, where errors are intentionally left to enhance security against passive eavesdroppers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcomm.2015.2474860

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. mihaljevi?, 2009, A framework for stream ciphers based on pseudorandomness, randomness and error-correcting coding, Enhancing Cryptographic Primitives with Techniques from Error Correcting Codes (Information and Communication Security), 23, 117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., Mu, J., Wei, S., Jiang, C., & Beaulieu, N. C.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Published
2015-11
Volume
63
Issue
11
Pages
4363-4376
ISSN
0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2184713351
Cited by
14
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Communications (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
Keywords
block cipher, cipher block chaining, avalanche effect, error propagation, error statistics, gap distribution, DES, AES, error control, eavesdropping security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review