Authorship Attribution of Social Media Messages
Abstract
The world is facing a new era in which social media communication plays a fundamental role in people’s lives. Along with proven benefits, several collateral drawbacks have risen, one being the widespread of false information with malicious intents, oftentimes using anonymous or false identities. Fighting this problem is challenging, especially when considering the nature of text messages involved on social media platforms: a sea of small messages and a myriad of users. Attributing the authorship of such messages is an ambitious endeavor; nevertheless, it is a way to fight this undesired disinformation scenario. In this work, we tackle the problem of authorship attribution of tiny messages, but, different from what has been done with longer texts, we rely upon data-driven approaches, avoiding handcraft features and harnessing recent advances of deep neural networks in the field of pattern recognition. By modeling small texts employed in social media as unidimensional signals, we propose a deep learning model to project these messages onto a manifold suitable for the task of authorship attribution. We provide two state-of-the-art solutions tailored for different setups and strategies for the scenario of authorship verification. These advances were possible, thanks to three additional contributions: an updated dataset based on the Twitter® platform, new sanitization techniques to improve the quality of the training data, and novel visual analytics techniques to help the developm…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The challenge in social media stems from the brief nature of posts and a large pool of potential authors, making the attribution of short documents particularly difficult.
“The challenge in social media stems from the brief nature of posts and a large pool of potential authors, making the attribution of short documents particularly difficult [Aborisade and Anwar, 2018;Seroussi et al., 2014;Theophilo et al., 2021].”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Theophilo et al., 2021
Cites
Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization
Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14871 · Cited by 928 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, according to Varol et al. [9], nearly 15% of Twitter ® accounts (50 million) are automated profiles devised to simulate real people.”
MethodComputational methods in authorship attribution
Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Argamon, S. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20961 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Authorship Attribution for Social Media Forensics
Rocha, A., Scheirer, W. J., Forstall, C. W., Cavalcante, T., Theophilo, A., Shen, B., Carvalho, A. R. B., & Stamatatos, E. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2016.2603960 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges
Huang, B., Chen, C., & Shu, K. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3715073.3715076 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Theophilo, A., Giot, R., & Rocha, A.
- Affiliations
- Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (Recod.ai), Institute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-23
- ISSN
- 2329-924X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-7476
- OpenAlex
- W3214195558
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), DéjàVu (#2017/12646-3, #2018/10204-6)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), DeepEyes Grant
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (#304497/2018-5)
- Google Latin America Research Awards
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- authorship attribution, authorship verification, social media posts, short text, disinformation, fake accounts, Twitter dataset, data sanitization, manifold learning, deep neural network, visual analytics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review