The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Command Filtered Adaptive Backstepping
Abstract
Implementation of adaptive backstepping controllers requires analytic calculation of the partial derivatives of certain stabilizing functions. It is well documented that, as the order of a nonlinear system increases, analytic calculation of these derivatives becomes prohibitive. Therefore, in practice, either alternative control approaches are used or the derivatives are neglected in the implementation. Neglecting the derivatives results in the loss of all guarantees proven by Lyapunov methods for the adaptive backstepping approach and may result in instability. This paper presents a new implementation approach for adaptive backstepping control. The main objectives are to facilitate the derivation and implementation of the adaptive backstepping approach, with performance guarantees proven by Lyapunov methods, for applications that were prohibitively difficult using the standard analytic implementation approach. The new approach uses filtering methods to produce certain command signals and their derivatives which eliminates the requirement of analytic differentiation. The approach also introduces filters to generate certain compensating signals necessary to compute compensated tracking errors suitable for adaptive parameter estimation. We present a set of Lemmas and Theorems to analyze the performance both during the initialization and the operating phases. We show that the initialization phase is of finite duration that can be controlled by selection of a design parameter. We also show that all signals within the system are bounded during this short initialization phase. During the operating phase, we show that the command filtered implementation approach has theoretical properties identical to those of the conventional approach. The general approach is presented and analyzed for systems in generalized parameter strict feedback form. Extensions of the approach are presented to demonstrate the application of the method to a land vehicle trajectory following application. Application and effectiveness of the proposed method is shown by simulation results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Observer-Based Dynamic Event-Triggered Control for Multiagent Systems With Time-Varying Delay
Cao, L., Pan, Y., Liang, H., & Huang, T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2022.3226873 · Cited by 340
Adaptive Command-Filtered Backstepping Control of Robot Arms With Compliant Actuators
Pan, Y., Wang, H., Li, X., & Yu, H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2017.2695600 · Cited by 210
Niu, S., Wang, J., Zhao, J., & Shen, W. (2024) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2023.10.017 · Cited by 54
Zhu, J., & Li, S. (2024) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.01.034 · Cited by 11
Zhu, J., & Li, S. (2025) · Asian Journal of Control · doi:10.1002/asjc.3411 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, W., Farrell, J. A., Polycarpou, M. M., Djapic, V., & Sharma, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 566-580
- ISSN
- 1063-6536 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0865
- OpenAlex
- W2137824246
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.