A Single-Level Rule-Based Model Predictive Control Approach for Energy Management of Grid-Connected Microgrids
Open accessAbstract
A single-level rule-based model predictive control (RBMPC) scheme is presented for optimizing the energy management of a grid-connected microgrid composed of local production units, renewable energy sources, local loads, and several types of energy storage systems (ESSs). The single-level controller uses two different models that yield different descriptions of the microgrid and use different sampling times. The model with a smaller sampling time provides a more detailed description of the microgrid, in order to keep track of the fast dynamics, while the model with a higher sampling time provides a less detailed description and is used for making long-term predictions when it is not needed anymore to track the fast dynamics. Moreover, we propose a novel RBMPC method that assigns the value to the binary decision variables in the hybrid microgrid model, e.g., ON or OFF status of the generators and charging or discharging mode of ESSs, through if-then-else rules, which rely on the price of electricity and the local net imbalance. The standard method of applying model predictive control (MPC) to a hybrid model results in a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem. Our proposed rule-based method is able to convert the standard MILP problem into a linear one. We compare our approach through simulations to the MILP approach and show that our method yields almost no loss in performance while providing a significant reduction in the computation time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MPC for ES control enables multiple objectives and constraints to be handled explicitly and allows the ES schedule to be tailored to improve voltage profiles, reduce losses, and respect both device and network limits.
“This enables multiple objectives and constraints to be handled explicitly and allows the ES schedule to be tailored to improve voltage profiles, reduce losses, and respect both device and network limits [86][87][88][89].”
From Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study (2026) · cites this paper as [89]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study
Rahman, O., Elphick, S., & Robinson, D. A. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15051074 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pippia, T., Sijs, J., & De Schutter, B.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2364-2376
- ISSN
- 1063-6536 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0865
- 2374-0159
- OpenAlex
- W2980479774
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- resolver.tudelft.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology (publishedVersion)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie (675318 (INCITE))
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- grid-connected microgrid, energy management, binary variables, energy storage systems, renewable energy, electricity prices, computation time reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review