The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization-Based Collision Avoidance
Open accessAbstract
This article presents a novel method for exactly reformulating nondifferentiable collision avoidance constraints into smooth, differentiable constraints using strong duality of convex optimization. We focus on a controlled object whose goal is to avoid obstacles while moving in an n-dimensional space. The proposed reformulation is exact, does not introduce any approximations, and applies to general obstacles and controlled objects that can be represented as the union of convex sets. We connect our results with the notion of signed distance, which is widely used in traditional trajectory generation algorithms. Our method can be applied to generic navigation and trajectory planning tasks, and the smoothness property allows the use of general-purpose gradient- and Hessian-based optimization algorithms. Finally, in case a collision cannot be avoided, our framework allows us to find “least-intrusive” trajectories, measured in terms of penetration. We demonstrate the efficacy of our framework on an automated parking problem, where our numerical experiments suggest that the proposed method is robust and enables real-time optimization-based trajectory planning in tight environments. Sample code of our example is provided at https://github.com/XiaojingGeorgeZhang/OBCA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths
Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300136 · Cited by 12,738
Rockafellar, R. T. (1970) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400873173 · Cited by 10,801
Wächter, A., & Biegler, L. T. (2006) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y · Cited by 9,483
Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots
Khatib, O. (1986) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836498600500106 · Cited by 7,894
Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning
Karaman, S., & Frazzoli, E. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364911406761 · Cited by 5,275
LaValle, S. M. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546877 · Cited by 5,211
Rajamani, R. (2012) · Mechanical Engineering Series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1433-9 · Cited by 4,401
Randomized Kinodynamic Planning
LaValle, S. M., & Kuffner, J. J. (2001) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783640122067453 · Cited by 3,254
A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-Driving Urban Vehicles
Paden, B., Cap, M., Yong, S. Z., Yershov, D., & Frazzoli, E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2016.2578706 · Cited by 2,585
Cited by
Safety-Critical Model Predictive Control with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Function
Zeng, J., Zhang, B., & Sreenath, K. (2021) · 2021 American Control Conference (ACC) · doi:10.23919/acc50511.2021.9483029 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Liniger, A., & Borrelli, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 972-983
- ISSN
- 1063-6536 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0865
- 2374-0159
- OpenAlex
- W3015470607
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization-Based Collision Avoidance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcst.2019.2949540
- The paper
- Zhang, X., Liniger, A., & Borrelli, F. (2021). Optimization-Based Collision Avoidance. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2019.2949540
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.