Network Adapter for Sampled Linear Systems Under Asynchronous and Delayed Communications: Quadrotor Remote Speed Control Through Cellular Network
Abstract
This brief analyzes the stability of the feedback interconnection of a class of dissipative linear systems, and more specifically, when the signals are sampled asynchronously and there are delays in the communication channel. The analysis is done taking into account the maximum sampling time that guarantees the preservation of the small gain (MASG) values. This brief proves that this property holds in the presence of constant delays and can be preserved under certain conditions with variable delays. A$L_{2}$-gain-based transformation is used to interconnect the systems with the aim to make them have finite$L_{2}$-gain and guarantee the small gain theorem. With this transformation, the maximum sampling time that guarantees the stability of the interconnection is enlarged. The last part of this brief is devoted to the experimental application of this methodology for the remote control of the rotors speeds of a quadrotor. A performance analysis for the remote control is presented based on real experiments for a 3rd generation partnership project (3GPP) cellular network.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Information Flow and Cooperative Control of Vehicle Formations
Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834433 · Cited by 4,616 · see citing works
Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey
Hokayem, P. F., & Spong, M. W. (2006) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2006.06.027 · Cited by 1,678 · see citing works
Dissipative Systems Analysis and Control
Brogliato, B., Maschke, B. M., Lozano, R., et al. (2006) · Communications and control engineering/Communications and control engineering series · doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-517-2 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Liang, X. M., & Xu, J. (2018) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2018.09.015 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
James, M. R. (2000) · Complex Systems · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511758744.007 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Passivity and Dissipativity Analysis of a System and Its Approximation
Xia, M., Antsaklis, P. J., Gupta, V., et al. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2016.2562919 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Control of Networked Systems Using the Scattering Transformation
Matiakis, T., Hirche, S., & BUSS, M. J. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2008.922570 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Passivity degradation under the discretization with the zero-order hold and the ideal sampler
Oishi, Y. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc.2010.5717886 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Several dissipativity and passivity implications in thelinear discrete‐time setting
Navarro-López, E. M. (2005) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/mpe.2005.599 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Synthesis of Distributed Robust H-Infinity Controllers for Interconnected Discrete Time Systems
van Horssen, E. P., & Weiland, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · doi:10.1109/tcns.2015.2476199 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Controller design for Networked Control Systems—An approach based on L 2 induced norm
Halder, K., Das, S., Dasgupta, S., et al. (2015) · Nonlinear Analysis Hybrid Systems · doi:10.1016/j.nahs.2015.08.002 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Chellaboina, V.-S., & Haddad, W. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.1109/acc.2000.879140 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Passivity of Interconnected Asynchronous Discrete-Time Systems
Cueli, J. R., & de Wit, C. C. (2008) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.3182/20080706-5-kr-1001.01739 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Dissipativity reinforcement in interconnected systems
Inoue, M., & Urata, K. (2018) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2018.05.006 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cano, J. M., López, M., & Rubio, F. R. (2011) · IET Control Theory and Applications · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2010.0205 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationDelay-independent stability for interconnected nonlinear systems with finite L2 gain
Chopra, N., & Spong, M. W. (2007) · 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control · doi:10.1109/cdc.2007.4434672
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- khalil, 2001, Nonlinear Control Systems
- van der schaft, 1999, $L_ 2 $ – Gain and Passivity Techniques in Nonlinear Control
- 2018, GNSS User Technology Report
- 2019, GNSS Market Report
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Cano, J. M., Lopez-Martinez, M., & Acosta, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
- European GNSS Agency, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, Camino de los Descubrimientos s.n., Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
- ORCID
- Acosta, J. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1736-1741
- ISSN
- 1063-6536 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0865
- 2374-0159
- OpenAlex
- W3198361438
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- PAIDI 2020 through the Project HOMPOT (PY20_00597)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
- Keywords
- sampled-data systems, asynchronous sampling, communication delay, small gain theorem, dissipative systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review