Fast and reliable structure-oriented video noise estimation
Abstract
Noise can significantly impact the effectiveness of video processing algorithms. This paper proposes a fast white-noise variance estimation that is reliable even in images with large textured areas. This method finds intensity-homogeneous blocks first and then estimates the noise variance in these blocks, taking image structure into account. This paper proposes a new measure to determine homogeneous blocks and a new structure analyzer for rejecting blocks with structure. This analyzer is based on high-pass operators and special masks for corners to stabilize the homogeneity estimation. For typical video quality (PSNR of 20-40 dB), the proposed method outperforms other methods significantly and the worst-case estimation error is 3 dB, which is suitable for real applications such as video broadcasts. The method performs well both in highly noisy and good-quality images. It also works well in images including few uniform blocks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004 · see citing works
Thresholding for Change Detection
Rosin, P. L. (2002) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.2002.0960 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Estimation of image noise variance
Rank, K., Lendl, M., & Unbehauen, R. (1999) · IEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal Processing · doi:10.1049/ip-vis:19990238 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Precision edge contrast and orientation estimation
Lyvers, E. P., & Mitchell, O. R. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.9114 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Estimation of Noise in Images: An Evaluation
Olsen, S. (1993) · Graphical Models and Image Processing · doi:10.1006/gmip.1993.1022 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Multiresolution Adaptive Image Smoothing
Meer, P., Park, R., & Cho, K. J. (1994) · CVGIP Graphical Models and Image Processing · doi:10.1006/cgip.1994.1013 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Wilson, J. H., Fabre, J. P., & Null, J. M. (2004) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2003.823316 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
A new video noise reduction algorithm using spatial subbands
Amer, A., & Schröder, H. (2002) · IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) · doi:10.1109/icecs.1996.582658 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content
Tu, Z., Wang, Y., Birkbeck, N., Adsumilli, B., & Bovik, A. C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2021.3072221 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amer, A., & Dubois, E.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- ORCID
- Amer, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-118
- ISSN
- 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233323564
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
- Keywords
- image structure analysis, corner detection, textured images, video broadcasting, video quality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review