Cited by 94Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Once for All: A Two-Flow Convolutional Neural Network for Visual Tracking

Open access
Chen, Kai, Tao, Wenbing·2018·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

Abstract

The main challenges of visual object tracking arise from the arbitrary appearance of the objects that need to be tracked. Most existing algorithms try to solve this problem by training a new model to regenerate or classify each tracked object. As a result, the model needs to be initialized and retrained for each new object. In this paper, we propose to track different objects in an object-independent approach with a novel two-flow convolutional neural network (YCNN). The YCNN takes two inputs (one is an object image patch, the other is a larger searching image patch), then outputs a response map which predicts how likely and where the object would appear in the search patch. Unlike the object-specific approaches, the YCNN is actually trained to measure the similarity between the two image patches. Thus, this model will not be limited to any specific object. Furthermore, the network is end-to-end trained to extract both shallow and deep dedicated convolutional features for visual tracking. And once properly trained, the YCNN can be used to track all kinds of objects without further training and updating. As a result, our algorithm is able to run at a very high speed of 45 frames-per-second. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm can also be proved by the experiments on two popular data sets: OTB-100 and VOT-2014.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsvt.2017.2757061

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep feature-based tracking methods have higher accuracy.

    “Deep featurebased tracking methods have gained the attention of the tracking community because of their higher accuracy [3,4].”

    From Multiple Cues-Based Robust Visual Object Tracking Method (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K., & Tao, W.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2018-12
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
3377-3386
ISSN
  • 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2205
OpenAlex
W2424629859
Cited by
94
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772213, 61371140, 2015CFA062, 2015BAA133, 2017010201010121)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
visual object tracking, patch similarity, response map, end-to-end learning, real-time tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review