Cited by 52Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesDigital Media Forensic DetectionImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Robust and Secure Image Fingerprinting Learned by Neural Network

Li, Yuenan, Wang, Dongdong, Tang, Linlin·2020·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

Abstract

Image fingerprinting is a technique that summarizes the perceptual characteristics of a digital image into an invariant digest, and it is one of the most effective solutions for digital rights management. Most conventional fingerprinting algorithms were developed by assembling manually designed feature extractor and quantizer, which requires extensive expert knowledge and may not capture the intrinsic or abstract visual characteristics of the digital image. Focusing on content identification related applications, we propose a data-driven image fingerprinting algorithm in this paper, where neural network is trained to automatically discover the optimal mapping from image to fingerprint. To ameliorate the difficulty of training, we start by training the fingerprint-computation network in a layer-wise manner to progressively improve its robustness against content-preserving distortions. Initialized by the states learned by layer-wise training, the network is then re-trained as a holistic unit, with the objective of maximizing its content identification accuracy. Moreover, we also develop a key-dependent version of the neural network-based fingerprinting algorithm. By quantifying its security using information-theoretic metrics, we have proved that the hierarchical architecture of neural network is beneficial to the security of fingerprinting algorithm. The experimental results on a large testing database show that the proposed work exhibits much higher content identification accuracy than state-of-the-art algorithms, and its execution speed is in the millisecond time scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2890966

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some deep learning schemes consider a limited variety of content retention operations, which is not enough to deal with image copyright protection.

    “Some schemes based on deep learning are designed to consider a limited variety of content retention operations, which are not enough to deal with the increasingly severe situation of image copyright protection.”
  • CNMC and IFNN are specially designed for picture copyright protection.

    “Where CNMC and IFNN are specially designed for picture copyright protection.”
  • CNMC, IFNN, DSH, and DBDH are based on deep learning.

    “CNMC [34], IFNN [33], DSH [29] and DBDH [44] are based on deep learning.”
  • There is few research on generating perceptual image hashes using deep neural networks, and there are many shortcomings, such as the large number of original images required for training and the insufficient variety of transformations that can be resisted.

    “However, to the best of our knowledge, there is few research on generating perceptual image hashes using deep neural networks, and there are many shortcomings, such as the large number of original images required for training and the insuf cient variety of transformations that can be resisted.”
  • Li et al.'s method [33] takes the lead in applying deep learning to the field of Perceptual Hashing, but it is not an end-to-end method and the combination of multiple codecs are still manually designed.

    “This method [33] takes the lead in applying deep learning to the eld of Perceptual Hashing, but it is not an end-to-end method and the combination of multiple codecs are still manually designed.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Wang, D., & Tang, L.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2020-02
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
362-375
ISSN
  • 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2205
OpenAlex
W2911013958
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61572352, 61202164)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
image fingerprinting, digital rights management, content identification, layer-wise training, data-driven feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review