The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Test Problems for Large-Scale Multiobjective and Many-Objective Optimization
Abstract
The interests in multiobjective and many-objective optimization have been rapidly increasing in the evolutionary computation community. However, most studies on multiobjective and many-objective optimization are limited to small-scale problems, despite the fact that many real-world multiobjective and many-objective optimization problems may involve a large number of decision variables. As has been evident in the history of evolutionary optimization, the development of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) for solving a particular type of optimization problems has undergone a co-evolution with the development of test problems. To promote the research on large-scale multiobjective and many-objective optimization, we propose a set of generic test problems based on design principles widely used in the literature of multiobjective and many-objective optimization. In order for the test problems to be able to reflect challenges in real-world applications, we consider mixed separability between decision variables and nonuniform correlation between decision variables and objective functions. To assess the proposed test problems, six representative evolutionary multiobjective and many-objective EAs are tested on the proposed test problems. Our empirical results indicate that although the compared algorithms exhibit slightly different capabilities in dealing with the challenges in the test problems, none of them are able to efficiently solve these optimization problems, calling for the need for developing new EAs dedicated to large-scale multiobjective and many-objective optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2007.892759 · Cited by 10,069
Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
May, R. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261459a0 · Cited by 7,001
A Competitive Swarm Optimizer for Large Scale Optimization
Cheng, R., & Jin, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2322602 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citation
Cited by
Platemo: a matlab platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization [educational forum]
Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., & Jin, Y. (2017) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2017.2742868 · Cited by 2,777
Self-citationLaszczyk, M., & Myszkowski, P. B. (2019) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2019.04.001 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, R., Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., & sendhoff, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4108-4121
- ISSN
- 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2275
- OpenAlex
- W2513211214
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.