Cited by 10,069Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications

MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition

Qingfu Zhang, Hui Li·2007·IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation

Abstract

Decomposition is a basic strategy in traditional multiobjective optimization. However, it has not yet been widely used in multiobjective evolutionary optimization. This paper proposes a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D). It decomposes a multiobjective optimization problem into a number of scalar optimization subproblems and optimizes them simultaneously. Each subproblem is optimized by only using information from its several neighboring subproblems, which makes MOEA/D have lower computational complexity at each generation than MOGLS and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). Experimental results have demonstrated that MOEA/D with simple decomposition methods outperforms or performs similarly to MOGLS and NSGA-II on multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problems and continuous multiobjective optimization problems. It has been shown that MOEA/D using objective normalization can deal with disparately-scaled objectives, and MOEA/D with an advanced decomposition method can generate a set of very evenly distributed solutions for 3-objective test instances. The ability of MOEA/D with small population, the scalability and sensitivity of MOEA/D have also been experimentally investigated in this paper.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tevc.2007.892759

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) has been proven to show very fast convergence speed toward the optimal solutions.

    “Recently Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) was proposed and it has been proven to show very fast convergence speed toward the optimal solutions [75].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Q., & Li, H.
Affiliations
University of Essex (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Published
2007-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
712-731
ISSN
  • 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0026
OpenAlex
W2143381319
Cited by
10,069
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1002 · 2025: 1108 · 2024: 995 · 2023: 949 · 2022: 932 · 2021: 885 · 2020: 743 · 2019: 751 · 2018: 600 · 2017: 530 · 2016: 411 · 2015: 343 · 2014: 271 · 2013: 194 · 2012: 148
FWCI
47.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Economic Affairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
MOEA/D, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, decomposition-based optimization, 0-1 knapsack problem, sensitivity analysis, small population size, Pareto front distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review