MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Abstract
Decomposition is a basic strategy in traditional multiobjective optimization. However, it has not yet been widely used in multiobjective evolutionary optimization. This paper proposes a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D). It decomposes a multiobjective optimization problem into a number of scalar optimization subproblems and optimizes them simultaneously. Each subproblem is optimized by only using information from its several neighboring subproblems, which makes MOEA/D have lower computational complexity at each generation than MOGLS and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). Experimental results have demonstrated that MOEA/D with simple decomposition methods outperforms or performs similarly to MOGLS and NSGA-II on multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problems and continuous multiobjective optimization problems. It has been shown that MOEA/D using objective normalization can deal with disparately-scaled objectives, and MOEA/D with an advanced decomposition method can generate a set of very evenly distributed solutions for 3-objective test instances. The ability of MOEA/D with small population, the scalability and sensitivity of MOEA/D have also been experimentally investigated in this paper.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) has been proven to show very fast convergence speed toward the optimal solutions.
“Recently Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) was proposed and it has been proven to show very fast convergence speed toward the optimal solutions [75].”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [75]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Platemo: a matlab platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization [educational forum]
Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., & Jin, Y. (2017) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2017.2742868 · Cited by 2,777 · see citing works
Designing Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI
Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300831 · Cited by 906 · see citing works
Antoniadi, A. M., Du, Y., Guendouz, Y., Wei, L., Mazo, C., Becker, B. A., & Mooney, C. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11115088 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Shukla, A., Verma, K., & Kumar, R. (2019) · IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0486 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
MOEA based memetic algorithms for multi-objective satellite range scheduling problem
Du, Y., Xing, L., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., & He, Y. (2019) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100576 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions
Oche, P. A., Ewa, G. A., & Ibekwe, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3132500 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“It has been shown that evolutionary algorithms such as Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-I) [73] and Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D) [74], can approximate the true PO solutions of multi-objective problems [70].”
MethodPreference-Based Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization for Agile Satellite Mission Planning
Li, L., Chen, H., Li, J., Jing, N., & Emmerich, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2859028 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Martínez-Álvarez, A., Crespo-Cano, R., Díaz-Tahoces, A., Cuenca-Asensi, S., Ferrández Vicente, J. M., & Fernández, E. (2016) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065716500210 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Energy Efficient and Multi-resource Optimization for Virtual Machine Placement by Improving MOEA/D
Wei, W., Gu, H., Xiao, Z., & Chen, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2025.3538525 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Q., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Essex (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 712-731
- ISSN
- 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0026
- OpenAlex
- W2143381319
- Cited by
- 10,069
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1002 · 2025: 1108 · 2024: 995 · 2023: 949 · 2022: 932 · 2021: 885 · 2020: 743 · 2019: 751 · 2018: 600 · 2017: 530 · 2016: 411 · 2015: 343 · 2014: 271 · 2013: 194 · 2012: 148
- FWCI
- 47.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Economic Affairs
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Keywords
- MOEA/D, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, decomposition-based optimization, 0-1 knapsack problem, sensitivity analysis, small population size, Pareto front distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review