The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Event-Triggered Consensus Control for Multi-Agent Systems Against False Data-Injection Attacks
Abstract
In this article, the event-triggered security consensus problem is studied for time-varying multiagent systems (MASs) against false data-injection attacks (FDIAs) and parameter uncertainties over a given finite horizon. In the process of information transmission, the malicious attacker tries to inject false signals to destroy consensus by compromising the integrity of measurements and control signals. The randomly occurring stealthy FDIAs on sensors and actuators are modeled by the Bernoulli processes. In order to reduce the unnecessary utilization of communication resources, an event-triggered control mechanism with state-dependent threshold is adopted to update the control input signal. The main objective of this article is to design a controller such that, under randomly occurring FDIAs and admissible parameter uncertainties, the MASs achieve consensus. By utilizing stochastic analysis method, two sufficient criteria are derived to ensure that the prescribed H∞ consensus performance can be achieved. Then, the desired controller gains are derived by solving recursive linear matrix inequalities. Simulation results are presented to illustrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed control method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems
Dimarogonas, D. V., Frazzoli, E., & Johansson, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2174666 · Cited by 2,556
Decentralized event-triggered consensus for linear multi-agent systems under general directed graphs
Yang, D., Ren, W., Liu, X., & Chen, W. (2016) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.03.003 · Cited by 470
Cited by
Li, Y., Qu, F., & Tong, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2020.2970454 · Cited by 447
Wang, J., Wang, D., Yan, H., & Shen, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2023.3326861 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X.-M., Zhou, Q., Li, P., Li, H., & Lu, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1856-1866
- ISSN
- 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2275
- OpenAlex
- W2973688650
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event-Triggered Consensus Control for Multi-Agent Systems Against False Data-Injection Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcyb.2019.2937951
- The paper
- Li, X.-M., Zhou, Q., Li, P., Li, H., & Lu, R. (2020). Event-Triggered Consensus Control for Multi-Agent Systems Against False Data-Injection Attacks. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2019.2937951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.