Cited by 80Caching and Content DeliveryIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCybersecurity and Information Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AccConF: An Access Control Framework for Leveraging In-Network Cached Data in the ICN-Enabled Wireless Edge

Misra, Satyajayant, Tourani, Reza, Natividad, Frank, Mick, Travis, Majd, Nahid Ebrahimi, Huang, Hong·2019·IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

Abstract

The fast-growing Internet traffic is increasingly becoming content-based and driven by mobile users, with users more interested in data rather than its source. This has precipitated the need for an information-centric Internet architecture. Research in information-centric networks (ICNs) have resulted in novel architectures, e.g., CCN/NDN, DONA, and PSIRP/PURSUIT; all agree on named data based addressing and pervasive caching as integral design components. With network-wide content caching, enforcement of content access control policies become non-trivial. Each caching node in the network needs to enforce access control policies with the help of the content provider. This becomes inefficient and prone to unbounded latencies especially during provider outages. In this paper, we propose an efficient access control framework for ICN, which allows legitimate users to access and use the cached content directly, and does not require verification/authentication by an online provider authentication server or the content serving router. This framework would help reduce the impact of system down-time from server outages and reduce delivery latency by leveraging caching while guaranteeing access only to legitimate users. Experimental/simulation results demonstrate the suitability of this scheme for all users, but particularly for mobile users, especially in terms of the security and latency overheads.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tdsc.2017.2672991

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1145/2484313.2484335 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/2500098.2500102 · DOI
  3. tourani, 2016, Security, privacy, and access control in information-centric networking: A survey, arXiv 1603 03409
  4. 10.1145/2491224.2491228 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/2018584.2018589 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/PCCC.2014.7017100 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/2342488.2342507 · DOI
  8. ghali, 2015, Interest-based access control for content centric networks (extended version), Proc 2nd Int Conf Inform -Centric Netw, 147
  9. 10.1145/2534169.2491717 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/CNS.2014.6997508 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TIFS.2014.2365742 · DOI
  12. zhang, 2015, Achieving content-oriented anonymity with CRISP, IEEE Trans Depend Secure Comput, pp, 1, 10.1109/TDSC.2015.2432814 · DOI
  13. fiat, 1993, Broadcast encryption, Proc Annu Int Cryptology Conf, 480
  14. xie, 2012, Enhancing cache robustness for content-centric networking, Proc IEEE InfoCom, 2426
  15. 10.1145/1282427.1282402 · DOI
  16. afanasyev, 2013, Interest flooding attack and countermeasures in named data networking, Proc IFIP Netw Conf, 1
  17. 10.1145/1658939.1658941 · DOI
  18. fotiou, 2010, Developing information networking further: From PSIRP to PURSUIT, Proc 7th Int ICST Conf Broadband Commun Netw Syst, 1
  19. tarkoma, 2009, The publish/subscribe internet routing paradigm (PSIRP): Designing the future internet architecture, Towards the Future Internet-A European Research Perspective, 102
  20. 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6231276 · DOI · Paper page
  21. dannewitz, 2009, NetInf: An information-centric design for the future Internet, Proc GI/ITG KuVS Workshop on the Future Internet, 1
  22. 10.1145/2089016.2089034 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/3-540-44647-8_3 · DOI
  24. menezes, 1997, Handbook of Applied Cryptography
  25. 10.1007/3-540-44586-2_16 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00196725 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/3-540-45472-1_1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 80

Metadata

Authors
Misra, S., Tourani, R., Natividad, F., Mick, T., Majd, N. E., & Huang, H.
Affiliations
  • New Mexico State University (US)
  • California State University, San Marcos (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 1545-5971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0018
  • 2160-9209
OpenAlex
W2590898937
Cited by
80
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • US National Science Foundation (1345232, 1248109)
  • U.S. DoD/ARO (W911NF-07-2-0027)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
Keywords
information-centric networking, access control, in-network caching, wireless edge computing, Named Data Networking, content-centric networking, delivery latency, mobile users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review