The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepChain: Auditable and Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning with Blockchain-based Incentive
Abstract
Deep learning can achieve higher accuracy than traditional machine learning algorithms in a variety of machine learning tasks. Recently, privacy-preserving deep learning has drawn tremendous attention from information security community, in which neither training data nor the training model is expected to be exposed. Federated learning is a popular learning mechanism, where multiple parties upload local gradients to a server and the server updates model parameters with the collected gradients. However, there are many security problems neglected in federated learning, for example, the participants may behave incorrectly in gradient collecting or parameter updating, and the server may be malicious as well. In this article, we present a distributed, secure, and fair deep learning framework named DeepChain to solve these problems. DeepChain provides a value-driven incentive mechanism based on Blockchain to force the participants to behave correctly. Meanwhile, DeepChain guarantees data privacy for each participant and provides auditability for the whole training process. We implement a prototype of DeepChain and conduct experiments on a real dataset for different settings, and the results show that our DeepChain is promising.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“References [18, 21] used Shamir secret sharing and threshold Paillier encryption to protect local gradients, respectively, but both consume large computation overhead.”
From A Blockchain‐Based Federated Learning Method for Smart Healthcare (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Squarepants, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,146
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250
(2013) · Cited by 5,372
Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3133982 · Cited by 3,956
Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols
Canetti, R. (2001) · Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.2001.959888 · Cited by 3,348
Large Scale Distributed Deep Networks
Dean, J. B., Corrado, G. S., Monga, R., Chen, K., Devin, M., Mao, M., Ranzato, M., Senior, A., Tucker, P. A., Yang, K., et al. (2012) · Cited by 3,202
Privacy-preserving deep learning
Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813687 · Cited by 2,356
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- goldreich, 2009, Foundations of Cryptography Volume 2 Basic Applications
- pyrgelis, 0, Knock knock, who’s there? membership inference on aggregate location data, Proc 25th Annu Netw Distrib Syst Security Symp NDSS 2018, 1
- 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2787987 · DOI · Paper page
- haykin, 1994, Neural Networks A Comprehensive Foundation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Lim, W. Y. B., Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Jiao, Y., Liang, Y.-C., Yang, Q., Niyato, D., & Miao, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986024 · Cited by 2,565
“A similar blockchain-based model is also introduced in [169] to provide data confidentiality, computation auditability, and incentives for the participants of FL.”
BackgroundA survey on security and privacy of federated learning
Mothukuri, V., Parizi, R. M., Pouriyeh, S., Huang, Y., Dehghantanha, A., & Srivastava, G. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.10.007 · Cited by 1,480
A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection
Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X., & He, B. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3124599 · Cited by 1,407
“The incentive mechanisms may be helpful [79], [80], [185].”
BackgroundA survey on large language model (LLM) security and privacy: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Yao, Y., Duan, J., Xu, K., Cai, Y., Sun, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · High-Confidence Computing · doi:10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100211 · Cited by 1,083
“…efforts that utilize traditional Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (e.g., zero-knowledge proofs, differential privacy, and federated learning) to tackle privacy challenges posed by LLMs. Exploring additional PETs techniques, whether they are established methods or innovative approaches, to…”
MethodSelf-citationKang, J., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D. T., Xie, S., & Zhang, J. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2940820 · Cited by 961
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weng, J., Weng, J., Zhang, J., Li, M., Zhang, Y., & Luo, W.
- Affiliations
- Jinan University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 2018
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1545-5971 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0018
- 2160-9209
- OpenAlex
- W2889157463
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 27
- FWCI
- 33.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (publishedVersion)
- IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1736203, 61732021, 61472165, 61373158)
- Guangdong Provincial Special Funds for Applied Technology Research and Development and Transformation of Important Scientific and Technological Achieve (2016B010124009)
- National Key RD Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1402600)
- National Key RD Plan of China (2017YFB0802203, 2018YFB1003701)
- Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center on Network Security Detection and Defence (2014B090904067)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- privacy-preserving deep learning, federated learning, blockchain, incentive mechanisms, auditability, data privacy, malicious server, participant behavior, distributed deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
