Cited by 53Network Security and Intrusion DetectionAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsInformation and Cyber Security

Hunting for Insider Threats Using LSTM-Based Anomaly Detection

Villarreal-Vasquez, Miguel, Modelo-Howard, Gaspar, Dube, Simant, Bhargava, Bharat·2023·IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

Abstract

Insider threats are one of the most difficult problems to solve, given the privileges and information available to insiders to launch different types of attacks. Current security systems can record and analyze sequences from a deluge of log data, potentially becoming a tool to detect insider threats. The issue is that insiders mix the sequence of attack steps with valid actions, reducing the capacity of security systems to programmatically detect the attacks. To address this shortcoming, we introduce LADOHD, an anomaly detection framework based on Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) models, which learns the expected event patterns in a computer system to identify attack sequences even when attacks span for a long time. The applicability of the framework is demonstrated on a dataset of 38.9 million events collected from a commercial network of 30 computers over twenty days and where a 4-day long insider threat attack occurs. Results show that LADOHD outperforms the anomaly detection system used to protect the commercial network with a True Positive Rate of 97.29% and a False Positive Rate of 0.38%. Experiments also show that LSTMs have higher prediction precision in variable-length sequences than methods like Hidden Markov Models, a crucial requirement in sequence-analysis-based anomaly detection techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tdsc.2021.3135639

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Villarreal-Vasquez et al. (2023) use LSTM to learn the patterns of benign event sequences and predict the probability of each event becoming the next event.

    “They then use LSTM to learn the patterns of benign event sequences and predict the probability of each event becoming the next event.”

    From BRITD: behavior rhythm insider threat detection with time awareness and user adaptation (2024) · cites this paper as Villarreal-Vasquez et al. (2023)

  • Villarreal-Vasquez et al. (2023) collect activity datasets from enterprise EDR systems and extract event sequences from the datasets.

    “Miguel Villarreal-Vasquez et al. collect activity datasets from enterprise EDR systems and extract event sequences from the datasets.”

    From BRITD: behavior rhythm insider threat detection with time awareness and user adaptation (2024) · cites this paper as Villarreal-Vasquez et al. (2023)

  • For Villarreal-Vasquez et al. (2023), the most repeated probability is considered the threshold; events with probabilities above the threshold are benign, and events with probabilities below the threshold are anomaly events.

    “The most repeated probability is considered the threshold.Events with probabilities above the threshold are benign events, while events with probabilities below the threshold are anomaly events.”

    From BRITD: behavior rhythm insider threat detection with time awareness and user adaptation (2024) · cites this paper as Villarreal-Vasquez et al. (2023)

  • Applications to insider threat data include processing CERT Insider Threat datasets (e.g., r4.2 and v6.2) for log examination and behavioral profiling.

    “Applications to insider threat data include processing CERT Insider Threat datasets (e.g., r4.2 and v6.2) for log examination and behavioral profiling [5,41,59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villarreal-Vasquez, M., Modelo-Howard, G., Dube, S., & Bhargava, B.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Palo Alto Networks (United States) (US)
  • Broadcom (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Published
2023-01-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
451-462
ISSN
  • 1545-5971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0018
  • 2160-9209
OpenAlex
W4206342677
Cited by
52
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Northrop Grumman Cybersecurity Research Consortium
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
insider threats, anomaly detection, long short-term memory, log analysis, event sequence modeling, network security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review