Cited by 11Silicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesRadiation Effects in ElectronicsGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Failure Mechanism of 1200-V SiC MOSFET With Embedded Schottky Barrier Diode Under Short-Circuit Condition

Li, Xu, Deng, Xiaochuan, Liao, Zhengxiang, Li, Xuan, Jia, Renxu, Zhang, Bo·2025·IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices

Abstract

The short-circuit ruggedness and failure mechanism of a commercial silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFET with embedded Schottky barrier diode (SBD-MOS) are evaluated and revealed in this article. Compared with a conventional planar-type SiC MOSFET (C-MOS), a distinctive difference in failure phenomenon is observed for SBD-MOS under short-circuit condition. When the short-circuit withstanding time ($\textit{t}_{\text{sc}}$) of SBD-MOS exceeds 3.5$\mu $s at 600-V bus voltage, the device fails to shut down, even though the gate is turned off. After a brief decrease, the short-circuit current rises again and continues for a period of time, eventually leading to the destructive failure. In contrast, C-MOS does not observe a similar event and$\textit{t}_{\text{sc}}$reaches to 6.5$\mu $s. The finite-element simulation and physical analysis reveal that short-circuit stress cause a severe leakage current within the embedded SBD, thereby preventing the interruption of short-circuit current. Unfortunately, the power dissipation caused by SBD leakage current provides a positive feedback with temperature, and thus, temperature continuously increases toward a higher value, eventually leading to the destructive failure of devices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ted.2024.3524371

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extended defects such as micropipes, basal plane dislocations, and stacking faults increase leakage current and reduce breakdown voltage in SiC.

    “Extended defects such as micropipes, basal plane dislocations (BPDs), and stacking faults increase leakage current and reduce breakdown voltage [60-62], while deep-level point defects (such as the Z1/2 and EH6/7 centers) act as carrier recombination centers that shorten carrier lifetime [2].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, X., Deng, X., Liao, Z., Li, X., Jia, R., & Zhang, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Xidian University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
Published
2025-03
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
1259-1263
ISSN
  • 0018-9383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9646
OpenAlex
W4406208670
Cited by
11
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62334004, 62274025)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20232027)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Keywords
SiC MOSFET, short-circuit ruggedness, short-circuit current, leakage current, temperature rise, positive feedback, power dissipation, 1200 V power devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review