Combination of eyetracking and computer vision for robotics control
Abstract
The manual control of manipulator robots can be complex and time consuming even for simple tasks, due to a number of degrees of freedom (DoF) of the robot that is higher than the number of simultaneous commands of the joystick. Among the emerging solutions, the eyetracking, which identifies the user gaze direction, is expected to automatically command some of the robot DoFs. However, the use of eyetracking in three dimensions (3D) still gives large and variable errors from several centimeters to several meters. The objective of this paper, is to combine eyetracking and computer vision to automate the approach of a robot to its targeted point by acquiring its 3D location. The methodology combines three steps : - A regular eyetracking device measures the user mean gaze direction. - The field of view of the user is recorded using a webcam, and the targeted point identified by image analysis. - The distance between the target and the user is computed using geometrical reconstruction, providing a 3D location point for the target. On 3 trials, the error analysis reveals that the computed coordinates of the target 3D localization has an average error of 5.5cm, which is 92% more accurate than using the eyetracking only for point of gaze calculation, with an estimated error of 72cm. Finally, we discuss an innovative way to complete the system with smart targets to overcome some of the current limitations of the proposed method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of eye-tracking and computer vision automates the approach of a robot to its targeted point by acquiring its 3D location.
“The combination of eye-tracking and computer vision automate the approach of a robot to its targeted point by acquiring its 3D location.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
The computed coordinates of the target 3D localisation have an average error of 5.5 cm, which is 92% more accurate than eye-tracking only for the point of gaze calculation, with an estimated error of 72 cm.
“The computed coordinates of the target 3D localisation have an average error of 5.5 cm, which is 92% more accurate than eye-tracking only for the point of gaze calculation, with an estimated error of 72 cm.”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12010135 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leroux, M., Raison, M., Adadja, T., & Achiche, S.
- Affiliations
- Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-05
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2112146451
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (publishedVersion)
- PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Keywords
- eye tracking, computer vision, robot control, gaze direction, 3D object localization, robot manipulators, geometric reconstruction, image analysis, SMART targets, human-robot interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review