The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Clustering Algorithms for Big Data: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Clustering algorithms have emerged as an alternative powerful meta-learning tool to accurately analyze the massive volume of data generated by modern applications. In particular, their main goal is to categorize data into clusters such that objects are grouped in the same cluster when they are similar according to specific metrics. There is a vast body of knowledge in the area of clustering and there has been attempts to analyze and categorize them for a larger number of applications. However, one of the major issues in using clustering algorithms for big data that causes confusion amongst practitioners is the lack of consensus in the definition of their properties as well as a lack of formal categorization. With the intention of alleviating these problems, this paper introduces concepts and algorithms related to clustering, a concise survey of existing (clustering) algorithms as well as providing a comparison, both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective. From a theoretical perspective, we developed a categorizing framework based on the main properties pointed out in previous studies. Empirically, we conducted extensive experiments where we compared the most representative algorithm from each of the categories using a large number of real (big) data sets. The effectiveness of the candidate clustering algorithms is measured through a number of internal and external validity metrics, stability, runtime, and scalability tests. In addition, we highlighted the set of clustering algorithms that are the best performing for big data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985) · Journal of Classification · doi:10.1007/bf01908075 · Cited by 8,219
Ankerst, M. (1999) · doi:10.1145/304181.304187 · Cited by 3,982
BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases
Zhang, T., Ramakrishnan, R., & Livny, M. (1996) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/235968.233324 · Cited by 2,097
Cited by
Big Data Analytics in Operations Management
Choi, T., Wallace, S. W., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12838 · Cited by 1,027
Tsai, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., Chao, H.-C., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-015-0030-3 · Cited by 818
A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation
Saggi, M. K., & Jain, S. (2018) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.01.010 · Cited by 494
Big data with cloud computing: Discussions and challenges
Sandhu, A. K. (2022) · Big Data Mining and Analytics · doi:10.26599/bdma.2021.9020016 · Cited by 280
Niknam, M., & Thulasiraman, P. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10133-3 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Fahad, A., Alshatri, N., Tari, Z., Alamri, A., Khalil, I., Zomaya, A. Y., Foufou, S., & Bouras, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-279
- ISSN
- 2168-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057923756
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 57.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Clustering Algorithms for Big Data: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tetc.2014.2330519
- The paper
- Fahad, A., Alshatri, N., Tari, Z., Alamri, A., Khalil, I., Zomaya, A. Y., Foufou, S., & Bouras, A. (2014). A Survey of Clustering Algorithms for Big Data: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tetc.2014.2330519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.