The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal Attacks on Logic Locking and Camouflaging Techniques
Abstract
With the adoption of a globalized and distributed IC design flow, IP piracy, reverse engineering, and counterfeiting threats are becoming more prevalent. Logic obfuscation techniques including logic locking and IC camouflaging have been developed to address these emergent challenges. A major challenge for logic locking and camouflaging techniques is to resist Boolean satisfiability (SAT) based attacks that can circumvent state-of-the-art solutions within minutes. Over the past year, multiple SAT attack resilient solutions such as Anti-SAT and AND-tree insertion (ATI) have been presented. In this paper, we perform a security analysis of these countermeasures and show that they leave structural traces behind in their attempts to thwart the SAT attack. We present three attacks, namely “signal probability skew” (SPS) attack, “AppSAT guided removal (AGR) attack, and “sensitization guided SAT” (SGS) attack”, that can break Anti-SAT and ATI, within minutes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Combinational profiles of sequential benchmark circuits
Brglez, F., Bryan, D., & Kozminski, K. (2003) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/iscas.1989.100747 · Cited by 2,095
Test pattern generation using Boolean satisfiability
Larrabee, T. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/43.108614 · Cited by 703
A Primer on Hardware Security: Models, Methods, and Metrics
Rostami, M., Koushanfar, F., & Karri, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2335155 · Cited by 658
Unveiling the ISCAS-85 benchmarks: a case study in reverse engineering
Hansen, M. C., Yalcin, H., & Hayes, J. P. (1999) · IEEE Design & Test of Computers · doi:10.1109/54.785838 · Cited by 544
Stealthy Dopant-Level Hardware Trojans
Becker, G. T., Regazzoni, F., Paar, C., & Burleson, W. P. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40349-1_12 · Cited by 264
Provably Secure Active IC Metering Techniques for Piracy Avoidance and Digital Rights Management
Koushanfar, F. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2011.2163307 · Cited by 161
Provably secure camouflaging strategy for IC protection
Li, M., Shamsi, K., Meade, T., Zhao, Z., Yu, B., Jin, Y., & Pan, D. Z. (2016) · doi:10.1145/2966986.2967065 · Cited by 114
Security analysis of logic encryption against the most effective side-channel attack: DPA
Yasin, M., Mazumdar, B., Ali, S. S., & Sinanoglu, O. (2015) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/dft.2015.7315143 · Cited by 48
Self-citationDevelopment of a Layout-Level Hardware Obfuscation Tool
Malik, S., Becker, G. T., Paar, C., & Burleson, W. P. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI · doi:10.1109/isvlsi.2015.118 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Yasin, M., Mazumdar, B., Sinanoglu, O., & Rajendran, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing
- Published
- 2020-04-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 517-532
- ISSN
- 2168-6750 (ISSN-L)
- 2376-4562
- OpenAlex
- W2747980214
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 33.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal Attacks on Logic Locking and Camouflaging Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tetc.2017.2740364
- The paper
- Yasin, M., Mazumdar, B., Sinanoglu, O., & Rajendran, J. (2020). Removal Attacks on Logic Locking and Camouflaging Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tetc.2017.2740364
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.