The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online Fall Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks on Smart Wearable Devices
Open accessAbstract
Unintentional falls can cause severe injuries and even death, especially if no immediate assistance is given. A fall detection system aims to detect a fall as soon as it occurs, therefore issuing an automatic assistance request. Wearable embedded sensors are emerging as the most viable solution for continuous monitoring since they are more effective, less intrusive and less expensive than other systems. Tailoring a deep learning method to the requirements of microcontrollers entails matching very stringent constraints in terms of both memory and computational power. In addition, datasets acquired with wearable devices are relatively scarce and not necessarily devised for supervised learning. In this work, we discuss the design of a software architecture based on recurrent neural networks which can be effective for fall detection while running entirely onboard a wearable device. The well-known and publicly-available SisFall dataset was adopted and extended with fine-grained temporal annotations to cope with the supervised training of recurrent neural networks. We then show that an appropriate process of architectural minimization together with accurate hyperparameters selection leads to a workable model which compares favorably with other detection techniques. The embedding of the resulting architecture has been validated using a state-of-art hardware device.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Unlike static classifiers, LSTMs maintain an internal memory state, allowing the model to distinguish between a “controlled descent” and a “sudden drop” based on the velocity history of the movement [18].”
From Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learningPreprint
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5555/3026877.3026899 · Cited by 16,548
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Han, S., Mao, H., & Dally, W. J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.00149 · Cited by 4,662
A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence LearningPreprint
Lipton, Z. C., Berkowitz, J. A., & Elkan, C. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.00019 · Cited by 3,159
Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition
Ordóñez, F., & Roggen, D. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010115 · Cited by 2,761 · cited 1×
“n of the classifier. Indeed, they investigate the use of ANN, KNN, Radial Basis Function (RBF), Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis (PPCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). The authors of [14] utilize a DL technique to detect falls. The architecture is composed by two parts: a Convolutional Network and a R…”
MethodHubara, I., Soudry, D., & Yaniv, R. E. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.02505 · Cited by 1,667
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 2008, WHO Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age
- goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
- huang, 2010, Fall detection system for healthcare quality improvement in residential care facilities, J Med Biol Eng, 30, 247, 10.5405/jmbe.30.5.04 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Queralta, J. P., Gia, T. N., Tenhunen, H., & Westerlund, T. (2019) · International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) · doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.8768883 · Cited by 154
Yu, X., Jang, J., & Xiong, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.692865 · Cited by 134
Intelligent Wearable Systems: Opportunities and Challenges in Health and Sports
Yang, L., Amin, O., & Shihada, B. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3648469 · Cited by 159
Jain, R., & Semwal, V. B. (2022) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3213814 · Cited by 118
“Musci et al. [21] have utilized a graphical annotation tool for assigning the temporal labels to fall activity data for the SisFall dataset, but again it was a manual approach and required a team of experts to perform the task.”
MethodInfluentialCasilari, E., Lora-Rivera, R., & García-Lagos, F. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20051466 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Musci, M., De Martini, D., Blago, N., Facchinetti, T., & Piastra, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing
- Published
- 2021-07-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1276-1289
- ISSN
- 2168-6750 (ISSN-L)
- 2376-4562
- OpenAlex
- W2797186212
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Regione Lombardia (139625)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
- Keywords
- fall detection, wearable sensors, recurrent neural networks, embedded deep learning, microcontroller, SisFall dataset, temporal annotation, model compression, hyperparameter optimization, software architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
