The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Tutorial for Competent Memetic Algorithms: Model, Taxonomy, and Design Issues
Open accessAbstract
The combination of evolutionary algorithms with local search was named "memetic algorithms" (MAs) (Moscato, 1989). These methods are inspired by models of natural systems that combine the evolutionary adaptation of a population with individual learning within the lifetimes of its members. Additionally, MAs are inspired by Richard Dawkin's concept of a meme, which represents a unit of cultural evolution that can exhibit local refinement (Dawkins, 1976). In the case of MA's, "memes" refer to the strategies (e.g., local refinement, perturbation, or constructive methods, etc.) that are employed to improve individuals. In this paper, we review some works on the application of MAs to well-known combinatorial optimization problems, and place them in a framework defined by a general syntactic model. This model provides us with a classification scheme based on a computable index D, which facilitates algorithmic comparisons and suggests areas for future research. Also, by having an abstract model for this class of metaheuristics, it is possible to explore their design space and better understand their behavior from a theoretical standpoint. We illustrate the theoretical and practical relevance of this model and taxonomy for MAs in the context of a discussion of important design issues that must be addressed to produce effective and efficient MAs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
Cited by
Ensemble of differential evolution variants
Wu, G., Shen, X., Li, H., Chen, H., Lin, A., & Suganthan, P. N. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.053 · Cited by 386
The 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
(2016) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2016.2545826 · Cited by 308
Hirjak, D., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Fritze, S., Sambataro, F., Kubera, K. M., & Wolf, R. C. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.009 · Cited by 60
Finding low autocorrelation binary sequences with memetic algorithms
Gallardo, J. E., Cotta, C., & Fernández, A. J. (2009) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.03.005 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Krasnogor, N., & Smith, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 474-488
- ISSN
- 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170186790
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Tutorial for Competent Memetic Algorithms: Model, Taxonomy, and Design Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tevc.2005.850260
- The paper
- Krasnogor, N., & Smith, J. (2005). A Tutorial for Competent Memetic Algorithms: Model, Taxonomy, and Design Issues. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2005.850260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.