The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RM-MEDA: A Regularity Model-Based Multiobjective Estimation of Distribution Algorithm
Abstract
Under mild conditions, it can be induced from the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condition that the Pareto set, in the decision space, of a continuous multiobjective optimization problem is a piecewise continuous (m - 1)-D manifold, where m is the number of objectives. Based on this regularity property, we propose a regularity model-based multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm (RM-MEDA) for continuous multiobjective optimization problems with variable linkages. At each generation, the proposed algorithm models a promising area in the decision space by a probability distribution whose centroid is a (m - 1)-D piecewise continuous manifold. The local principal component analysis algorithm is used for building such a model. New trial solutions are sampled from the model thus built. A nondominated sorting-based selection is used for choosing solutions for the next generation. Systematic experiments have shown that, overall, RM-MEDA outperforms three other state-of-the-art algorithms, namely, GDE3, PCX-NSGA-II, and MIDEA, on a set of test instances with variable linkages. We have demonstrated that, compared with GDE3, RM-MEDA is not sensitive to algorithmic parameters, and has good scalability to the number of decision variables in the case of nonlinear variable linkages. A few shortcomings of RM-MEDA have also been identified and discussed in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2007.892759 · Cited by 10,069
Self-citation
Cited by
Platemo: a matlab platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization [educational forum]
Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., & Jin, Y. (2017) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2017.2742868 · Cited by 2,777
Self-citationAn introduction and survey of estimation of distribution algorithms
Hauschild, M., & Pelikan, M. (2011) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2011.08.003 · Cited by 478
A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Using Gaussian Process-Based Inverse Modeling
Cheng, R., Jin, Y., Narukawa, K., & Sendhoff, B. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2015.2395073 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Q., Zhou, A., & Jin, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-63
- ISSN
- 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0026
- OpenAlex
- W2140886193
- Cited by
- 827
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RM-MEDA: A Regularity Model-Based Multiobjective Estimation of Distribution Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tevc.2007.894202
- The paper
- Zhang, Q., Zhou, A., & Jin, Y. (2008). RM-MEDA: A Regularity Model-Based Multiobjective Estimation of Distribution Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2007.894202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.