Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Seeking Multiple Solutions: An Updated Survey on Niching Methods and Their Applications

Open access
Li, Xiaodong, Epitropakis, Michael G., Deb, Kalyanmoy, Engelbrecht, Andries·2017·IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation

Abstract

Multimodal optimization (MMO) aiming to locate multiple optimal (or near-optimal) solutions in a single simulation run has practical relevance to problem solving across many fields. Population-based meta-heuristics have been shown particularly effective in solving MMO problems, if equipped with specifically-designed diversity-preserving mechanisms, commonly known as niching methods. This paper provides an updated survey on niching methods. This paper first revisits the fundamental concepts about niching and its most representative schemes, then reviews the most recent development of niching methods, including novel and hybrid methods, performance measures, and benchmarks for their assessment. Furthermore, this paper surveys previous attempts at leveraging the capabilities of niching to facilitate various optimization tasks (e.g., multiobjective and dynamic optimization) and machine learning tasks (e.g., clustering, feature selection, and learning ensembles). A list of successful applications of niching methods to real-world problems is presented to demonstrate the capabilities of niching methods in providing solutions that are difficult for other optimization methods to offer. The significant practical value of niching methods is clearly exemplified through these applications. Finally, this paper poses challenges and research questions on niching that are yet to be appropriately addressed. Providing answers to these questions is crucial before we can bring more fruitful benefits of niching to real-world problem solving.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tevc.2016.2638437

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Li, X., Epitropakis, M. G., Deb, K., & Engelbrecht, A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Published
2017-08
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
518-538
ISSN
  • 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0026
OpenAlex
W2564330218
Cited by
339
References
94
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seeking Multiple Solutions: An Updated Survey on Niching Methods and Their Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tevc.2016.2638437
The paper
Li, X., Epitropakis, M. G., Deb, K., & Engelbrecht, A. (2017). Seeking Multiple Solutions: An Updated Survey on Niching Methods and Their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2016.2638437

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.