The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Strengthened Dominance Relation Considering Convergence and Diversity for Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization
Abstract
Both convergence and diversity are crucial to evolutionary many-objective optimization, whereas most existing dominance relations show poor performance in balancing them, thus easily leading to a set of solutions concentrating on a small region of the Pareto fronts. In this paper, a novel dominance relation is proposed to better balance convergence and diversity for evolutionary many-objective optimization. In the proposed dominance relation, an adaptive niching technique is developed based on the angles between the candidate solutions, where only the best converged candidate solution is identified to be nondominated in each niche. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed dominance relation outperforms existing dominance relations in balancing convergence and diversity. A modified NSGA-II is suggested based on the proposed dominance relation, which shows competitiveness against the state-of-the-art algorithms in solving many-objective optimization problems. The effectiveness of the proposed dominance relation is also verified on several other existing multi- and many-objective evolutionary algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,010
Goldberg, D. E., & Shakespeare, W. (2002) · Cited by 16,088
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Deb, K., & Kalyanmoy, D. (2001) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 14,918
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2007.892759 · Cited by 10,069
Deb, K., & Jain, H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2013.2281535 · Cited by 7,133
Platemo: a matlab platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization [educational forum]
Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., & Jin, Y. (2017) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2017.2742868 · Cited by 2,777
Self-citationMultiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology
Chankong, V., & Haimes, Y. Y. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,371
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art
Zhou, A., Qu, B.-Y., Li, H., Zhao, S.-Z., Suganthan, P. N., & Zhang, Q. (2011) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2011.03.001 · Cited by 2,255
Jain, H., & Deb, K. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2013.2281534 · Cited by 2,172
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., Su, Y., & Jin, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-345
- ISSN
- 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0026
- OpenAlex
- W2888338796
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Strengthened Dominance Relation Considering Convergence and Diversity for Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tevc.2018.2866854
- The paper
- Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., Su, Y., & Jin, Y. (2019). A Strengthened Dominance Relation Considering Convergence and Diversity for Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2018.2866854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
