Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling

Sugeno, M., Yasukawa, T.·1993·IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

This paper discusses a general approach to quali- tative modeling based on fuzzy logic. The method of qualitative modeling is divided into two parts: fuzzy modeling and linguistic approximation. It proposes to use a fuzzy clustering method (fuzzy c-means method) to identify the structure of a fuzzy model. To clarify the advantages of the proposed method, it also shows some examples of modeling, among them a model of a dynamical process and a model of a human operator's control action.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tfuzz.1993.390281

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 2,411

Metadata

Authors
Sugeno, M., & Yasukawa, T.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Published
1993-02
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
7
ISSN
1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159265133
Cited by
2,411
References
1
FWCI
59.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tfuzz.1993.390281
The paper
Sugeno, M., & Yasukawa, T. (1993). A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.1993.390281

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.