The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Multiobjective Evolutionary Approach to Concurrently Learn Rule and Data Bases of Linguistic Fuzzy-Rule-Based Systems
Abstract
In this paper, we propose the use of a multiobjective evolutionary approach to generate a set of linguistic fuzzy-rule-based systems with different tradeoffs between accuracy and interpretability in regression problems. Accuracy and interpretability are measured in terms of approximation error and rule base (RB) complexity, respectively. The proposed approach is based on concurrently learning RBs and parameters of the membership functions of the associated linguistic labels. To manage the size of the search space, we have integrated the linguistic two-tuple representation model, which allows the symbolic translation of a label by only considering one parameter, with an efficient modification of the well-known (2$+$2) Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy (PAES). We tested our approach on nine real-world datasets of different sizes and with different numbers of variables. Besides the (2$+$2)PAES, we have also used the well-known non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and an accuracy-driven single-objective evolutionary algorithm (EA). We employed these optimization techniques both to concurrently learn rules and parameters and to learn only rules. We compared the different approaches by applying a nonparametric statistical test for pairwise comparisons, thus taking into consideration three representative points from the obtained Pareto fronts in the case of the multiobjective EAs. Finally, a data-complexity measure, which is typically used in pattern recognition to evaluate the data density in terms of average number of patterns per variable, has been introduced to characterize regression problems. Results confirm the effectiveness of our approach, particularly for (possibly high-dimensional) datasets with high values of the complexity metric.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.890332 · Cited by 2,662
Self-citationHandbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures: Third Edition
Sheskin, D. J. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9781420036268 · Cited by 1,551
Cited by
Interpretability of linguistic fuzzy rule-based systems: An overview of interpretability measures
Gacto, M. J., Alcalá, R., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.021 · Cited by 565
Self-citationFuzzy Broad Learning System: A Novel Neuro-Fuzzy Model for Regression and Classification
Feng, S., & Chen, C. L. P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2857815 · Cited by 490
Cordón, O. (2011) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2011.03.004 · Cited by 347
Fazzolari, M., Alcala, R., Nojima, Y., Ishibuchi, H., & Herrera, F. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2201338 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alcala, R., Ducange, P., Herrera, F., Lazzerini, B., & Marcelloni, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1106-1122
- ISSN
- 1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0034
- OpenAlex
- W2158325524
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Approach to Concurrently Learn Rule and Data Bases of Linguistic Fuzzy-Rule-Based Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tfuzz.2009.2023113
- The paper
- Alcala, R., Ducange, P., Herrera, F., Lazzerini, B., & Marcelloni, F. (2009). A Multiobjective Evolutionary Approach to Concurrently Learn Rule and Data Bases of Linguistic Fuzzy-Rule-Based Systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2009.2023113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.