Cited by 33Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

Water relations of forest trees

Gates, D.M.·1991·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.1991.1019467

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gates, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Gates, D.M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
1991-11
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
836
ISSN
0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155663494
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Agricultural Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
forest trees, water relations, tree water status, forest hydrology, transpiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review