The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling of ground-penetrating Radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties
Abstract
The possibility to estimate accurately the subsurface electric properties from ground-penetrating radar (GPR) signals using inverse modeling is obstructed by the appropriateness of the forward model describing the GPR subsurface system. In this paper, we improved the recently developed approach of Lambot et al. whose success relies on a stepped-frequency continuous-wave (SFCW) radar combined with an off-ground monostatic transverse electromagnetic horn antenna. This radar configuration enables realistic and efficient forward modeling. We included in the initial model: 1) the multiple reflections occurring between the antenna and the soil surface using a positive feedback loop in the antenna block diagram and 2) the frequency dependence of the electric properties using a local linear approximation of the Debye model. The model was validated in laboratory conditions on a tank filled with a two-layered sand subject to different water contents. Results showed remarkable agreement between the measured and modeled Green's functions. Model inversion for the dielectric permittivity further demonstrated the accuracy of the method. Inversion for the electric conductivity led to less satisfactory results. However, a sensitivity analysis demonstrated the good stability properties of the inverse solution and put forward the necessity to reduce the remaining clutter by a factor 10. This may partly be achieved through a better characterization of the antenna transfer functions and by performing measurements in an environment without close extraneous scatterers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Warren, C., Giannopoulos, A., & Giannakis, I. (2016) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.08.020 · Cited by 991
On the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Soil Moisture at the Field Scale
Vereecken, H., Huisman, J. A., Pachepsky, Y., Montzka, C., van der Kruk, J., Bogena, H., Weihermüller, L., Herbst, M., Martinez, G., & Vanderborght, J. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.061 · Cited by 584
López, C. J., Caleja, C., Prieto, M. A., Barreiro, M. F., Barros, L., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2018) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.103 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambot, S., Slob, E. C., van den Bosch, I., Stockbroeckx, B., & Vanclooster, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2555-2568
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144535965
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling of ground-penetrating Radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2004.834800
- The paper
- Lambot, S., Slob, E. C., van den Bosch, I., Stockbroeckx, B., & Vanclooster, M. (2004). Modeling of ground-penetrating Radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2004.834800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.