The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data
Abstract
Statistical classification of byperspectral data is challenging because the inputs are high in dimension and represent multiple classes that are sometimes quite mixed, while the amount and quality of ground truth in the form of labeled data is typically limited. The resulting classifiers are often unstable and have poor generalization. This work investigates two approaches based on the concept of random forests of classifiers implemented within a binary hierarchical multiclassifier system, with the goal of achieving improved generalization of the classifier in analysis of hyperspectral data, particularly when the quantity of training data is limited. A new classifier is proposed that incorporates bagging of training samples and adaptive random subspace feature selection within a binary hierarchical classifier (BHC), such that the number of features that is selected at each node of the tree is dependent on the quantity of associated training data. Results are compared to a random forest implementation based on the framework of classification and regression trees. For both methods, classification results obtained from experiments on data acquired by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer instrument over the Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and by Hyperion on the NASA Earth Observing 1 satellite over the Okavango Delta of Botswana are superior to those from the original best basis BHC algorithm and a random subspace extension of the BHC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Cited by
Mutanga, O., Adam, E., & Cho, M. A. (2012) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.012 · Cited by 854
Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification With Edge-Preserving Filtering
Kang, X., Li, S., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2013.2264508 · Cited by 704
Multisource Remote Sensing Data Classification Based on Convolutional Neural Network
Xu, X., Li, W., Ran, Q., Du, Q., Gao, L., & Zhang, B. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2756851 · Cited by 689
Domain adaptation for the classification of remote sensing data: An overview of recent advances
Tuia, D., Persello, C., & Bruzzone, L. (2016) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2016.2548504 · Cited by 675
On Creating Benchmark Dataset for Aerial Image Interpretation: Reviews, Guidances, and Million-AID
Long, Y., Xia, G.-S., Li, S., Yang, W., Yang, M. Y., Zhu, X. X., Zhang, L., & Li, D. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2021.3070368 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Ham, J., Chen, Y., Crawford, M. M., & Ghosh, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 492-501
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101711129
- Cited by
- 1,276
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2004.842481
- The paper
- Ham, J., Chen, Y., Crawford, M. M., & Ghosh, J. (2005). Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2004.842481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.