Cited by 704Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification With Edge-Preserving Filtering

Kang, Xudong, Li, Shutao, Benediktsson, Jon Atli·2014·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

The integration of spatial context in the classification of hyperspectral images is known to be an effective way in improving classification accuracy. In this paper, a novel spectral-spatial classification framework based on edge-preserving filtering is proposed. The proposed framework consists of the following three steps. First, the hyperspectral image is classified using a pixelwise classifier, e.g., the support vector machine classifier. Then, the resulting classification map is represented as multiple probability maps, and edge-preserving filtering is conducted on each probability map, with the first principal component or the first three principal components of the hyperspectral image serving as the gray or color guidance image. Finally, according to the filtered probability maps, the class of each pixel is selected based on the maximum probability. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed edge-preserving filtering based classification method can improve the classification accuracy significantly in a very short time. Thus, it can be easily applied in real applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2013.2264508

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feature extraction and feature selection are dedicated to learning temporal, spatial and spectral features in images and even intrinsic priors in the production line to narrow intraclass variation and expand interclass distance.

    “Essentially, feature extraction and feature selection are dedicated to learning the temporal, spatial [13-15] and spectral features [16, 17] in images and even the intrinsic priors in the production line [18] to narrow the intraclass variation and expand the interclass distance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, X., Li, S., & Benediktsson, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Iceland (IS)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2014-05
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
2666-2677
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2166923144
Cited by
704
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1
FWCI
58.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate
  • Chinese Scholarship Award for Excellent Doctoral Student
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
hyperspectral image classification, spectral-spatial classification, edge-preserving filtering, spatial context, probability maps, support vector machine, principal components

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review