Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tree Species Classification in Boreal Forests With Hyperspectral Data

Open access
Dalponte, Michele, Orka, Hans Ole, Gobakken, Terje, Gianelle, Damiano, Naesset, Erik·2013·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Tree species mapping in forest areas is an important topic in forest inventory. In recent years, several studies have been carried out using different types of hyperspectral sensors under various forest conditions. The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential of two high spectral and spatial resolution hyperspectral sensors (HySpex-VNIR 1600 and HySpex-SWIR 320i), operating at different wavelengths, for tree species classification of boreal forests. To address this objective, many experiments were carried out, taking into consideration: 1) three classifiers (support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), and Gaussian maximum likelihood); 2) two spatial resolutions (1.5 m and 0.4 m pixel sizes); 3) two subsets of spectral bands (all and a selection); and 4) two spatial levels (pixel and tree levels). The study area is characterized by the presence of four classes 1) Norway spruce, 2) Scots pine, together with 3) scattered Birch and 4) other broadleaves. Our results showed that: 1) the HySpex VNIR 1600 sensor is effective in boreal tree species classification with kappa accuracies over 0.8 (with Pine and Spruce reaching producer's accuracies higher than 95%); 2) the role of the HySpex-SWIR 320i is limited, and its bands alone are able to properly separate only Pine and Spruce species; 3) the spatial resolution has a strong effect on the classification accuracy (an overall decrease of more than 20% between 0.4 m and 1.5 m spatial resolution); and 4) there is no significant difference between SVM or RF classifiers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2012.2216272

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Dalponte, M., Orka, H. O., Gobakken, T., Gianelle, D., & Naesset, E.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2013-05
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
2632-2645
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2059217921
Cited by
378
References
0
FWCI
26.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tree Species Classification in Boreal Forests With Hyperspectral Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2012.2216272
The paper
Dalponte, M., Orka, H. O., Gobakken, T., Gianelle, D., & Naesset, E. (2013). Tree Species Classification in Boreal Forests With Hyperspectral Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2012.2216272

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.