The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised Feature Learning for Aerial Scene Classification
Abstract
The rich data provided by high-resolution satellite imagery allow us to directly model aerial scenes by understanding their spatial and structural patterns. While pixel- and object-based classification approaches are widely used for satellite image analysis, often these approaches exploit the high-fidelity image data in a limited way. In this paper, we explore an unsupervised feature learning approach for scene classification. Dense low-level feature descriptors are extracted to characterize the local spatial patterns. These unlabeled feature measurements are exploited in a novel way to learn a set of basis functions. The low-level feature descriptors are encoded in terms of the basis functions to generate new sparse representation for the feature descriptors. We show that the statistics generated from the sparse features characterize the scene well producing excellent classification accuracy. We apply our technique to several challenging aerial scene data sets: ORNL-I data set consisting of 1-m spatial resolution satellite imagery with diverse sensor and scene characteristics representing five land-use categories, UCMERCED data set representing twenty one different aerial scene categories with sub-meter resolution, and ORNL-II data set for large-facility scene detection. Our results are highly promising and, on the UCMERCED data set we outperform the previous best results. We demonstrate that the proposed aerial scene classification method can be highly effective in developing a detection system that can be used to automatically scan large-scale high-resolution satellite imagery for detecting large facilities such as a shopping mall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials Using Three-Dimensional Textons
Leung, T., & Malik, J. (2001) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1011126920638 · Cited by 1,498 · cited 3×
“Following [21], for each scale we set the Gaussian width correspondingly to {1, √ 2, 2, 2 √ 2}.”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art
Cheng, G., Han, J., & Lu, X. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2017.2675998 · Cited by 2,926
AID: A benchmark data set for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification
Xia, G.-S., Hu, J., Hu, F., Shi, B., Bai, X., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., & Lu, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2685945 · Cited by 2,372
Huang, B., Zhao, B., & Song, Y. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.050 · Cited by 591
PatternNet: A benchmark dataset for performance evaluation of remote sensing image retrieval
Zhou, W., Newsam, S., Li, C., & Shao, Z. (2018) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.01.004 · Cited by 571
Self-Supervised Learning in Remote Sensing: A review
Wang, Y., Albrecht, C. M., Braham, N. A. A., Mou, L., & Zhu, X. X. (2022) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2022.3198244 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheriyadat, A. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 439-451
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2006603039
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 74.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised Feature Learning for Aerial Scene Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2013.2241444
- The paper
- Cheriyadat, A. M. (2014). Unsupervised Feature Learning for Aerial Scene Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2013.2241444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.