Cited by 571Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

PatternNet: A benchmark dataset for performance evaluation of remote sensing image retrieval

Open access
Zhou, Weixun, Newsam, Shawn, Li, Congmin, Shao, Zhenfeng·2018·ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.01.004

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For medium-resolution and low-resolution satellite image data, there is a lack of benchmark datasets, while several high-resolution benchmark datasets exist (PatternNet, UCMD, aerial image dataset).

    “For medium-resolution and low-resolution satellite image data, in particular, there is a lack of benchmark datasets, while several highresolution benchmark datasets exist (PatternNet, UCMD, aerial image dataset) (Zhou et al., 2018).”

    From Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review (2019) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2018

    Section 3.1 (pp. 13–14) identifies UCMD as a benchmark and describes AID; Section 3.2 (p. 17) identifies PatternNet as a high-resolution dataset. The paper does not say that benchmark datasets are lacking specifically for medium- and low-resolution satellite imagery. It also notes that AID includes images at varying resolutions (Section 3.1, pp. 14, 16). (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [43][43] M. Volpi, D. Tuia, Dense semantic labeling of subdecimeter resolution images with convolutional neural networks, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55 (2017) 881-893. -
  2. [78][78] H. Jé gou, M. Douze, C. Schmid, P. Pé rez, Aggregating local descriptors into a compact representation, in: IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2010: pp. 3304-3311. -
  3. [103][103] Deng, J.; Dong, W.; Socher, R.; Li, L.J.; Li, K.; Fei-Fei, L., ImageNet: A largescale hierarchical image database, in: 2009 IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., IEEE, 2009: pp. 2-9. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, W., Newsam, S., Li, C., & Shao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Shao, Zhenfeng
Venue
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
145
Pages
197-209
ISSN
0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2626107033
Cited by
571
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 1
FWCI
35.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2016YFB0502603)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042016kf0179, 2042016kf1019, 2016070204010114)
  • Wuhan Chen Guang Project
  • Guangzhou science and technology project (201604020070)
  • Special task of technical innovation in Hubei Province (2016AAA018)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61671332, 41771452, 41771454)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
remote sensing image retrieval, benchmark dataset, high-resolution imagery, land use and land cover classification, deep learning, performance evaluation, background noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review