Cited by 321Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationFace and Expression RecognitionAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques

Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification via Multiscale Adaptive Sparse Representation

Leyuan Fang, Shutao Li, Xudong Kang, Benediktsson, Jon Atli·2014·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Sparse representation has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool in classification of hyperspectral images (HSIs). The spatial context of an HSI can be exploited by first defining a local region for each test pixel and then jointly representing pixels within each region by a set of common training atoms (samples). However, the selection of the optimal region scale (size) for different HSIs with different types of structures is a nontrivial task. In this paper, considering that regions of different scales incorporate the complementary yet correlated information for classification, a multiscale adaptive sparse representation (MASR) model is proposed. The MASR effectively exploits spatial information at multiple scales via an adaptive sparse strategy. The adaptive sparse strategy not only restricts pixels from different scales to be represented by training atoms from a particular class but also allows the selected atoms for these pixels to be varied, thus providing an improved representation. Experiments on several real HSI data sets demonstrate the qualitative and quantitative superiority of the proposed MASR algorithm when compared to several well-known classifiers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2014.2318058

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feature extraction and feature selection are dedicated to learning temporal, spatial and spectral features in images and even intrinsic priors in the production line to narrow intraclass variation and expand interclass distance.

    “Essentially, feature extraction and feature selection are dedicated to learning the temporal, spatial [13-15] and spectral features [16, 17] in images and even the intrinsic priors in the production line [18] to narrow the intraclass variation and expand the interclass distance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, L., Li, S., Kang, X., & Benediktsson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • University of Iceland (IS)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2014-12
Volume
52
Issue
12
Pages
7738-7749
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2052160904
Cited by
321
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 3
FWCI
47.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61172161)
  • National Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (61325007)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Hunan University
  • Scholarship Award for Excellent Doctoral Student granted by the Chinese Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
Keywords
hyperspectral image classification, sparse representation, spatial context, spectral-spatial features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review